Featured

The Tinder Killer Who Raped and Murdered When Out on Bail to be Tried Later This Year

Danueal Drayton, 31, the so-called Tinder Serial Killer, was arraigned last Friday, accused of first-degree murder, sexual misconduct, grand larceny and identity theft, believed to have killed a nurse he met on Tinder then engaged “in sexual conduct with the dead body.”

Danuael Drayton, accused of rape and murder.

He will return to court in New York on 23 May; his trial is scheduled for 27 August. He is being held without bail.

Samantha Stewart was a 29-year-old nurse who met Drayton, then 27, on Tinder. They shared an artichoke pizza the evening of 16 July 2018. Her father Kenneth found Samantha the following morning, her naked body wrapped in a blanket and dumped in a corner. Several of her teeth were knocked out.

Samantha Stewart.

The cause of death was strangulation.

Samantha’s body being removed from her home in Queens on 17 July 2018.

Drayton was caught on a neighbour’s surveillance system arriving at and leaving Samantha’s home. He drove away in a white van the morning of 17 July: it was found abandoned at JFK the following day. By this time, The New York Times revealed, Drayton used Samantha’s driver’s licence and credit card to fly to Los Angeles. He was arrested on 24 July for keeping a woman he met on a shared Uber ride prisoner in his hotel room. Charged with attempted murder, forcible rape, sexual penetration by a foreign object and false imprisonment, bail was set at $1.25 million. Drayton remained in the county jail until his extradition to New York last week.

He told LAPD he is a serial killer and murdered two women in Connecticut and four in New York.

And Drayton should not have been free to rape and murder.

He was arrested on 30 June 2018 in Nassau County (New York) for attempting to strangle his ex-girlfriend. Judge Erica Prager was unaware of his lengthy criminal record in Connecticut. So was the prosecutor. So were court clerks; even Legal Aid had no idea. So Judge Prager set bail at $2,000. However, charged with attempted strangulation as he was, bail should have been denied. Kenneth Stewart, father of Samantha, expressed his anger after Drayton was arrested in Los Angeles: “I will fly over there and volunteer to take him out of the cell,” he fumed. “This monster gets out and has the nerve to fly to L.A. to commit another crime, to destroy another family.”

The New York Times assigned blame to “missing paperwork” for his release.

Drayton stalked his victim, Zynea Barney, 26, before trying to kill her. They met on the dating app Plenty of Fish. The relationship was soon over. Refusing to accept rejection, Drayton rang and texted Zynea obsessively. Then he slept in front of her apartment house, even climbing a ladder to an open window. Then he slashed her tyres and threatened to kill her young son.

Extreme behaviour of this type was nothing new for him: Drayton was arrested at five times in Connecticut between 2011 and 2018.

  • Arrested Thanksgiving Day, 2011 in East Haven, Connecticut. Drayton beats his sleeping live-in girlfriend awake, sending her body “into shock” and causing her to lose control of her bladder. He chokes to the point of unconsciusness after she reaches for the phone. Arrested, his bail is set at $20,000, reduced to a written promise to appear in court on 23 March 2012.
  • Arrested 29 March 2012 in East Haven. Drayton breaks a glass bottle of juice over the same woman’s head after she says the relationship is indeed over. Once again, he chokes her until she blacks out. Drayton is arrested, charged with first-degree assault and strangulation and held on a $250,000 bond.
  • August 2012: Judge Patrick Clifford orders a mental health evaluation by the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS) then “held a hearing where he ruled that Drayton was unable to understand the proceeding against him”. Ruled incompetent to stand trial, Drayton is found competent 60 days later.
  • October 2012: Judge Clifford sentences Drayton to 8 years in prison, suspended after 3 years with 3 years probation.
  • November 2014: Drayton is released to probation. He will miss “at least six appointments” with his probation officer.
  • Arrested in May 2015 in Waterbury, Connecticut. Police are called after neighbours hear a woman scream. Drayton is arrested and charged with unlawful restraint. A protective order is issued that he violates several weeks later: the woman finds him sitting on her floor watching television. He is arrested again and held on a $10,000 bond.
  • December 2015, Waterbury, Connecticut: Drayton pleads guilty and is sentenced to 2 years in prison, released on 6 April 2017.
  • October 2017, New Haven, Connecticut: Drayton is living in a homeless shelter. A childhood friend invites him to stay, but asks Drayton to leave after he accuses them of “stealing from his disability checks”. Drayton stays with a woman in Brooklyn he met on Tinder.
  • Arrested January 2018 in New Haven. Drayton sends his friend “threatening” messages and goes on Facebook, offering $250 to anyone willing to kill them. Charged with second-degree harassment, Drayton is sentenced to 90 days in jail in March, suspended with one year of probation.

Zynea assured Drayton they could stay in touch, but was nonetheless uneasy by early June. At the end of the month, he unexpectedly asked her to lunch, saying he wanted to see her before moving to California. Zynea agreed. After lunch, she drove them to a park. Drayton asked if their relationship was truly over. It was. “Let’s just separate, be friends,” Zynea suggested, adding: “We can hang out from time to time”.

Drayron responded by pinning her down in the driver’s seat and choking her.

“Fucking bitch,” he shouted, “I’m going to kill you, I’m going to kill you, I’m going to kill you.”

Zynea unfastened her seat belt and got out of the too quickly for Drayton to stop her. So he got out of the car on the passenger side and walked around the car towards her. Three passerby rushed to her aid, chasing Drayton away. He was in public, yet continued to threaten Zynea. Arrested that day, 30 June, he was charged with strangulation and criminal trespass. And released on 5 July.

He had not been arrested for raping a Tinder date in Park Slope (Brooklyn) on 17 June. The 23-year-old victim filed a complaint with NYPD’s famed Special Victims’s Unit and was able to identify her attacker thanks to surveillance footage and facial recognition technology.

If convicted of the murder of Samantha Stewart, Drayton faces 25 years to life.

Featured

Naomi Irion’s Brother Went on FB; Deeply Upset by How Police Handled the Case

The Lyon’s County Sheriff’s Office announced on Friday that a charge of open murder with use of a deadly weapon has been filed against Troy Driver, the man who stands accused of kidnapping Naomi Irion, 18, on 12 March from the Walmart parking lot in Fernley, Nevada and subsequently murdering her. And Driver faces additional charges in connection with the case, all felonies: robbery, burglary and destruction of evidence.

His new Chevy truck was impounded, taken from where he was arrested (at a residence in Fallon, Nevada) and taken into evidence.

Naomi lived with her older brother Casey Valley. He and his family endured the harrowing experience of looking at the man (via Zoom) accused of abducting and murdering Naomi on Wednesday 30 March. A two-page-long criminal complaint was filed including the following, that Troy Edward Driver ‘did hold or detain her for the purpose of committing sexual assault and/or purpose of killing her.’

Imagine hearing those words read aloud in a courtroom, when you know that your daughter or baby sister is almost certainly dead, the victim of homicide. This became public knowledge the following day, when Naomi’s death was ruled a homicide; ‘authorities with the Churchill County Sheriff’s Office responded to a tip that led them to possible gravesite…the tip was then passed on to the Washoe County Sheriff’s Office Forensic Investigative Services team, who responded to the scene to process.’

Naomi’s family in court on Wednesday, 30 March. They knew a body had been found, likely to be Naomi’s.

The body of a female was found in a ‘makeshift’ grave. Forensics used DNA to determine that the remains were those of Naomi Christine Irion.

The cause of death, while known, has not been released for fear of compromising the investigation.

Driver is being held at the county jail in Yerington on a $750,000 bond. Casey Valley expressed his amazement. ‘I’m surpised there was bail at all.’ But it is as good as denying the accused bail outright. A convicted felon, Driver was released from state prison in California in 2012 and from parole supervision in 2014.

He moved to Nevada in 2012 and has worked for different construction companies ever since.

Diana and Herve Irion flew from their home in South Africa to help find her daughter. Diana is a mathematician who, ironically enough, enjoys crime novels and watching true crime television programmes. But her familiarity with statistics served to make her realise earlier than most in the same situation that a happy outcome was unlikely. She says the ordeal is ‘the worst thing in my life’, the worst thing that has ever happened to her. Diana Irion said her daughter’s name. ‘Let’s make her famous,’ she says, ‘let’s not make an animal that murdered her famous.’

Too bloody right.

Her son Casey Valley, deeply frustrated with how the Lyon County’s Sherrif’s Office handled the case, soon went on Facebook to address the public. He reports how he rang the Sheriff’s Office to report Naomi as missing on 13/03 at approximately 9:30 pm. A deputy arrived at 11:23 pm, but Valley says a missing person’s report was not filed until 9:00 pm on 15/03, almost 48 hours later. Valley says that the report was filed only after he personally went to Walmart to see the surveillance, or as he wrote (in uppercase) on Facebook: ‘AFTER I WENT AND FOUND THAT FOOTAGE MYSELF’.

Casey Valley and his sisters Tamara Cartwright and the late Naomi Irion.

What would have happened if Valley hadn’t gone to Walmart to see the footage for himself? (Incidentally, the footage has not yet been released to the public.) Valley went to Walmart to see the footage because of how LCSO was handing the case, making him feel ‘powerless’.

News 4 Fox 11 (Reno) journalist Zac Slotemaker asked Valley: ‘Do you think you should have to be your own loved one’s detective?’

‘I don’t believe any family member should have to be a detective for sure,’ Valley replied.

He and his family are understandably upset, believing that 36 hours could have ‘made all the difference’. Valley reiterated his frustration on Friday, 1 April:

‘I called at 9:30 pm on that Sunday, I believe it was the 13th, I basically left a message with the deputy and dispatch said that the deputy would come by my house and take a report. That did not occur. So, that deputy called me at around 11:23 pm and then he said something to the effect of “let’s see what happens tomorrow.”‘

Why did it take 36 hours to locate Naomi’s car, found less than a mile from the Walmart parking lot, as Casey wrote in upper case letters: ‘IN CLEAR VIEW OF THE INTERSTATE’. As Naomi’s family contends, 36 hours could have made all the difference.

Her car could easily be seen from the highway but wasn’t found by the authorities for 36 hours?

Casey added: ‘If this deputy had followed the lyon county Sherrifs [sic] office procedure (as he is sworn to do), a BOLO (be on the look out) and a missing persons report would have been filed as soon as I called that Sunday. But he didn’t. Because he didn’t.’ #trustthefamily

Why did the authorities drag their heels? A woman who wishes to remain anonymous reported being followed to the Walmart parking lot on 9 February; Naomi was abducted from the same parking lot one month later. This woman, who does not wish to be identified, filmed the man who followed her and took down his license plate number before ringing the police.

And the police appeared to have no recollection of the woman who was stalked at the same parking lot the previous month. Exactly how many stalkers could there be anywhere near that parking lot?

BTW, the woman has identified her stalker as none other than Troy Driver.

Naomi’s family, while ‘disappointed’ by the lack of a speedy response by the LCSO, is ‘grateful and impressed’ with what law enforcement subsequently accomplished, quickly making an arrest and bringing the family ‘closure’. And there is a small measure of comfort: there are CCW (concealed carry weapon) classes named for Naomi; Valley is gratified, adding that one should always be prepared, that what happened to his sister could happen to anyone.

Featured

A Change of Venue for the Upcoming Flores Trial: What the Judge Took into Consideration

As you may be aware, Paul Flores was arrested in April 2021 for the murder of Kristin Smart, a fellow student at California Polytechnic, in 1996. His father Ruben too was arrested, charged as an accessory after the fact for helping his son hide the body.

Kristin Smart shortly before her murder in 1996.

After listening to arguments from their attorneys, the Hon. Craig van Rooyen of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, California granted a change of venue on Wednesday, saying it is ‘a reasonable likelihood’ that neither would receive a fair trial in that county. His Honor observed that the case is the most publicised criminal case in San Luis Obispo County history – and may have tainted the pool of potential jurors.

Ruben Flores and his son Paul, both arrested in April 2021, 25 years after Kristin Smart was murdered.

Judge van Rooyen was required to take the following five factors into consideration before granting the change of venue:

  1. The nature and gravity of the offence
  2. The nature and extent of media coverage
  3. The pool of potential jurors
  4. The status (or lack of it) of the accused in the community
  5. Both the popularity and prominence of the victim

Paul Flores, now 45, is believed to have murdered fellow California Polytechnic student Kristin Smart in 1996 after she rejected his advances, suspected of killing her during an attempt at rape. This is entirely possible: Flores was exposed as a probable serial rapist after his arrest in 2021, prompting victims to come forward.

As van Rooyen pointed out, the case was subjected to intense public scrutiny for 25 years before the Floreses were arrested. He took into account speculation in newspaper articles about the case, speculation on social media and websites as well as podcasts. Judge van Rooyen believes the Floreses will receive a fair trial in another county, but is concerned that the impartiality of potential jurors in San Luis Obispo county has been affected. ‘I don’t think this case is discussed around dinner tables in other counties like it is in this county,’ he said. And while van Rooyen appreciates the need to support the Smart family in the county, there are two sides to every trial.

Featured

Death in the Heartland: The Murder of Nikki Wilhoite

Andrew Wilhoite, a farmer in Lebanon, Indiana, appeared in court today, charged with the murder of his wife of twelve years, Elizabeth Richards Wilhoite, known to almost everyone as Nikki. She turned forty-two on 24 March, the day her husband murdered her.

Diagnosed with breast cancer last fall, Nikki joyously announced on social media earlier this month that had had her last round of chemotherapy.

Nikki was very popular and had been since her teens, blessed with a cheerful nature. Described as ‘fun’, her enjoyment of life was reportedly ‘infectious’. And she ‘a devoted mom’, the mother of two and stepmother of one.

But despite being on the road to recovery, all was not well. Nikki’s husband Andrew was having an affair. She knew about it and with the good news about her health surely bolstering her, Nikke decided she wanted a fresh start and hired an attorney, petitioning the Boone County Circuit Court on either 17 or 18 March (sources differ) for a legal separation.

She was dead within the week.

Farmer Andrew N. Wilhoite is thirty-nine. An unfaithful husband, he was nonetheless furious that his wife dared to ask for a divorce. Nikki presented him with papers to sign, but he refused, saying he wanted to consult his lawyer.

And Wilhoite was outraged that Nikki withdrew $3,000 from the bank to pay her lawyer.

They fought bitterly for three hours the night of 24 March, Wilhoite telling law enforcement that he was lying in bed when a ‘drunk’ Nikki ‘flipped out’ and ‘went for him’, scratching his neck.

Seems Wilhoite had seen a true crime drama or two. Scratches are viewed with suspicion by the authorities and with good reason: scratches are a sign of a struggle, with victims scratching attackers rather than the other way around.

The highly dependable Nikki failed to turn up for work (she worked at an oral and maxillofacial practice). A worried co-worker rang. Wilhoite went to the trouble of ringing his father – who knew nothing about what happened to his daughter-in-law – to ask him to search the property. Not surprisingly, there was no sign of Nikki. Law enforcement was suspicious because Nikki’s car, her bag and keys were not missing, only she was. Her stepdaughter said she thought Nikki might have gone to her sister’s house, where she went ‘when she gets upset’.

Well, Nikki had a lot to be upset about: an unfaithful husband who had reportedly struck her in the past.

The Wilhoite property near Lebanon, Indiana

Blood was found on the sheets and a pillowcase in the master bedroom and on the basin in the master bathroom, blood from his scratches. And Nikki had had a nosebleed.

Or so Wilhoite said.

Thomas Richards bluntly told the authorities that he was afraid Wilhoite had ‘done something’ to his daughter.

But his son-in-law did not break until interrogated, when he finally confessed to throwing a cement ‘gallon-size’ flowerpot with earth in it in his wife’s face. Unconscious, she collapsed on the floor. Without bothering to check if she was breathing, Wilhoite picked Nikki up and tossed her in the back of his truck.

The Indiana State Police found her body partly sumerged under three feet of water on Saturday, 26 March. However, she did not drown, confirmed by Boone County Coroner Justin Sparks, who ruled her death a homicide the same day. Boone County Prosecutor Kent Eastwood confirmed this on Monday, 28 March. ‘All signs point to that she died at home,’ he said. ‘Nothing indicates that she drowned.’

Boone Superior Court Judge Matthew Kincaid has set a pre-trial court date of 29 August for Andrew, who is being held at the county jail without bond. If convicted, he faces 45 -60 years in prison.

Nikki was laid to rest on 2 April, buried in Nineveh Cemetery in Nineveh, Indiana, almost seventy miles away from Lebanon.

Wilhoite allegedly hit Nikki before murdering her. If you are a vicitm of domestic abuse, there is help: in the US, there is the National Domestic Abuse Hotline at 1-800-799-7233. (In the event of an emergency, ring 911.) There is refuge.org in the UK. Freephone and 24/7, ring: 0808 2000 247; in the event of an emergency, ring 999. In the Republic of Ireland, ring the 24hr National Freephone Helpline at 1800 341 900. (In the event of an emergency, ring 999 or 112.)

Andrew Wilhoite

Featured

Troy Driver Charged with the Kidnapping and Murder of Naomi Irion

This is a developing case and I will update as best I can. Please do not send hate to anyone mentioned in this blog post; all information is readily obtainable online.

Troy Driver at his arraignment last week, appearing in court via Zoom, charged with charged with the abduction of Naomi Irion. Meant to appear in court via Zoom today, the date has been pushed back to 10 May.

Troy Driver was rearraigned today in a Nevada courtroom. Arraigned there last week for kidnapping Naomi Irion, an amended complaint was filed on Tuesday. Driver stands accused of murder with a deadly weapon, and felony charges of kidnapping, robbery, burglary and destruction of evidence.

His lead attorney says Driver is innocent and that the defence intends to investigate the matter. “We are looking forward to getting the true story out,” Richard P. Davies said, adding: “Right now everyone is jumping to conclusions and that is natural.”

Richard P. Davies is a defence attorney with two practices, one in Reno, the other in Las Vegas. He has practised law solely in the state of Nevada since 2005. He graduated from Loyola Marymount University in 1992 and attended law school at Lewis and Clark College, Northwestern University, graduating in 2004. Driver was represented solely by public defender Mario Walther at his arraignment last week; now both Davies and Walther will work on has defence. Walther has practised law solely in the state of Nevada since 2015. There is no information regarding his education on the Martindale-Hubbell website; according to the Walther Law Offices website, Walther graduated from the McGeorge Law School at the University of the Pacific; there is no mention of where he attended university.

Driver, 41, was arrested at home in Fallon, Nevada on 25 March, charged with kidnapping Naomi Irion, 18, from a Walmart parking lot in Fernley (Nevada) on 12 March.

Naomi’s family sat in the gallery in court today, just as they did when Driver was arraigned. He made both appearances in court virtually and is being held at the county jail. Granted bail of $750,000 at the arraignment, he was denied bail today. Lawyer Davies raised no objections.

Today, Naomi’s brother Casey Valley expressed relief on behalf of his family that Naomi is “not suffering”. At the arraignment, they knew that a body likely to be hers had just been found, news not yet released to the public.

DNA soon proved that the remains found in a ‘makeshift’ grave in a ‘remote’ stretch of Churchill County, Nevada were those of Naomi Christine Irion.

Driver was scheduled to make another virtual appearance in court on 5 April, but that was cancelled at the eleventh hour, the date was moved up to 10 May. Then the date was changed to 8 April, this Friday; Driver will be arraigned on charges of first-degree murder with use of a deadly weapon and felony charges of robbery, burglary and destruction of evidence.

Naomi used to leave her car in the Walmart parking lot in Fernley, Nevada and wait for the shuttle that took her to her job at Panasonic in Reno, 30 miles away. She lived with her brother, Casey Valley, but planned to move into her own apartment and enroll in community college.

She never had the chance; a man in a grey hoodie was circling the parking lot that morning saw to that. Caught on surveillance footage, law enforcement believes this man is Troy Driver.

  • Saturday, 12 March, 5:23 am: Naomi, who has been on social media since 5:09 am, receives a Snapchat.
  • 5:24 am: The man in the grey hoodie approaches her car.
  • 5:25 am: The car is driven off the parking lot.
  • Approximately 5:35 am: Naomi’s cell phone goes “dark”. Ten minutes have passed; her car will be found 10 minutes away from Walmart. Prosecutors believe Driver either tampered with her cell phone or destroyed it outright.

Despite a BOLO (law enforcement acronym for “Be On the Look Out”) for Naomi’s blue 1992 Mercury Sable and despite its visibility from the highway, the car is not found until 15 March, by which time Naomi had been missing for 3 days.

Naomi may have been dead by this time. The estimated date of death has not yet been released, but the cause has: gunshot wounds to the head and chest.

  • 25 March: Convicted felon Troy Edward Driver, 41, is arrested at 5:30 pm.
  • 29 March: The FBI increases its reward “for information leading to the location of” Naomi Irion to $10,000
  • 29 March: Law enforcement discovers a body in a “makeshift” grave in a “remote” part of Churchill County, tipped off as to the location. The name of the informant has not yet been released; it may have been an anonymous tip. Troy Driver lives in Churchill County.
  • 30 March: Driver is arraigned virtually from the county jail in Yerington. Prosecutors alleged in documents filed that day that the defendant did abduct Naomi Irion and did hold or detain her for the purpose of committing sexual assault and/or for the purpose of killing her.” Bail is set at $750,000.

Okay, law enforcement was tipped off. Naomi’s body was found. But if Driver shot and killed her and buried her there, as the prosecution contends, who other than he knew where to find the body? And why?

And how did Driver, a convicted felon, obtain a firearm?

A brother with his sisters: Casey Valley with Tamara Cartwright (centre) and the late Naomi Irion.

Casey Valley hoped his sister would be found alive until the very end. Their sister Tamara Cartwright quickly set up a GoFundMe account, raising over $37,000 to help find Naomi. Diana and Herve flew from their home in South Africa – Herve Irion works for the US State Department – to do whatever they could to help. And a group of volunteers would have searched for her on Saturday, 2 April.

Valley and his family are openly disappointed by the way the case was handled, under the impression that there was no sense of urgency. But they made a point of thanking law enforcement for their efforts nonetheless.

So who is Troy Driver?

Troy Edward Driver was born on 20 April (Hitler’s birthday, incidentally) 1980 in California. He moved to Nevada after serving 15 years in state prison in his home state. He has a violent past: every offince he has been convicted of – all in California – involved a firearm.

Driver was released from prison in 2012. Moving to Nevada – where he has relatives – the same year, he began working in construction, and was soon working in a supervisory capacity. Steadily employed, he bought a new dark blue or black Chevrolet truck recently. Law enforcement shared a photograph of a vehicle of this description on social media after Naomi disappeared. When Driver was arrested. At that time, his truck was impounded and taken into evidence.

Troy Driver, arrested and charged with the kidnapping of Naomi Irion on 12 March of this year and her subsequent murder.

Was Naomi forced into the truck? Her brother Casey says she would have ‘frozen’ in fear if threatened by a stranger.

Naomi Irion, described as a ‘very loving’ and ‘very compassionate’ person.

Driver has a long criminal history. To reiterate: every offence involves firearms.

  • 1992: At the age of 12, Troy Edward Driver is sentenced to community service for shooting a deer out of season.
  • 1994: Now 14, Driver was put on probation for burglary, breaking into more than one private residence and the Quality Firearms gun shop in Ukiah, California. His probation officer remembers Driver saying it was “easier to rob someone than to work and earn the money”. Driver was a behaviour problem in juvenile hall, alternately threatening staff and refusing to follow instructions, even staging a fake suicide attempt. His probation officer remembers him as “quite a charmer”, but noticed that Driver was adept at telling him what he wanted to hear, always had “all the right answers”.
  • 1995: Driver starts smoking marijuana. He may have drifted into methamphetamine use as well.
  • 1997: On 20 February, Driver and his friend Carl Dulinsky broke into the Coast-to-Coast Hardware store in Willets, California and stole firearms. On 4 April at 2:30 am, Driver, now 16, and Dulinsky, 19, robbed the Circle K convenience store and pertrol station on East Perkins Street in Ukiah, California armed with a semi-automatic pistol and a pistol-grip shotgun. Driver’s sister Sharla, 19, drove the getaway car. Ten days later, the boys used the same weapons to rob two Chevron petrol stations at gunpoint. Sharla was the getaway driver once again.
  • 1997: Driver turned 17 on 20 April. Seventeen-year-old Alissa Moore is with Driver, Sharla and Dulinsky in Paul Rodriguez’s 1986 Mercury Cougar. Paul Rodriguez is nineteen, Moore’s boyfriend – and a methamphetamine dealer. Moore reportedly complained to Driver about Rodriguez, showing him bruises. Driver invited Moore to live with him and his parents for her protection, but she declined. During the ride, the boys, and possibly Sharla agree to help her murder Rodriguez.
  • 1997: Paul Rodriguez is murdered in the early hours of 22 April. Everyone involved – Sharla will insist that she was a captive audience of one in the car when the others outlined a plan for murder – is swiftly arrested.

Moore lured Rodriguez to the Driver family home in semi-rural Willets, California, having hidden a shotgun Dulinsky – whose father is a criminal – lent her in a horse trailer on the property next to the driveway. Arriving with Rodriguez before 12:30 am, Moore retrieved the shotgun while her boyfriend was examining the engine of a 1983 Dodge Aries in the driveway. Either Driver or Dulinsky knew which wire to disconnect to back up what Moore told Rodriguez, that the car had broken down.

Sharla, Driver and Dulinsky watched as Moore shot Rodriguez in the head.

Chaos followed. Driver took the weapon away from an hysterical Moore, who began making ‘declarations of love’ to the body. But she soon calmed down: Sgt. Kevin Broin of the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office said she helped the boys “stuff” Rodriguez’s 270-pound body into the trunk of his own car. And she casually pocketed her dead boyfriend’s wallet, scooping up his loose change from the driveway.

The Aries was back in running order. After she was arrested, Sharla told law enforcement that after getting “violently sick” that she drove to the house, raced inside and cowered in her bedroom. But she must have followed the others in Rodriguez’s maroon Cougar. The boys left the body in a shallow grave (sound familiar?) off Highway 128, 3 miles east of Navarro. Navarro is 58 miles from Willets by car. Since the Cougar was torched to destroy evidence, how did everyone get home?

In the real world, Sharla must have given everyone a ride home in the Aries. Someone gave Dulinsky a ride: shaken to his core, he implored “them” to “just take me home”.

Driver and Dulinsky were soon arrested in connection with the murder of Paul Rodriguez, they and Sharla reportedly implicated by Moore.

Dulinsky appeared in court on 9 May; it was he who led law enforcement to the shallow grave. The he and Driver were charged on 14 May with the robberies and burglary.

Sharla Driver, married to an American serviceman stationed in Italy, fled the United States, but was tracked down by the FBI. Jailed in Italy from June 1997 to February 1998, Sharla was extradited to Mendocino County and would plead guilty to accessory after the fact to murder and two counts of second-degree robbery for driving the getaway car for her brother and Dulinsky.

Presenting herself as a captive audience of one, Sharla insisted that she merely “overheard” the others outline a plan for murder that day in Rodriguez’s car. Why asked why she did not alert the authorities, Sharla replied: ‘I didn’t think they were really going to do it.’ The prosecuting attorney made his disbelief crystal clear, remarking that it would be ‘difficult to prosecute [her] for homicide.’

Alissa Moore was successfully prosecuted for second-degree murder. Currently incarcerated at the Central California Women’s Facility in Chowchilla, California, Moore was denied parole in 2013 and given she remains incarcerated, must have been denied parole in November 2021. Now 43 years old, she was sentenced to 15 years to life.

But Dulinsky turned his life completely around. His story is not only remarkable, but inspirational.

His upbringing was chaotic, his parents abusers of heroin and alcohol. Becoming a Christian at 15, Dulinsky would drift into drug abuse, his drugs of choice including LSD and meth. Yet he “hated addiction”. After he and Troy Driver were arrested, Dulinsky saw a fellow inmate carrying a Bible and remembered his flirtation with Christianity. He put his life in God’s hands and committed himself to reading the Bible and praying every day. Writing to the church he once attended, a girl who remembered him replied: Danielle assured him that she and others at the church were praying for him. Feeling far less alone, Dulinsky continued with his Bible study and prayers and found it in himself to forgive his parents. Mysteriously, as he continued to pray, his charges were reduced: Dulinsky served under 5 years in prison. Driver, sentenced to 15 years, was expected to be released after 12 years, but served the full sentence.

Carl and Danielle married after his release and have a daughter they named Moriah.

The court ordered Sharla, a methamphetamine addict, into a recovery programme. She served two years in the county jail, the price of being a getaway driver. In an ideal world, Driver would have been charged with accessory before and after the fact. In the real world, accessory before the fact would have been difficult to prosecute. However, he received a stiff sentence thanks to California’s Three Strikes Law, passed just three years earlier in 1994. Simply put, Driver exceeded the limit of felony charges and to quote the old song: “For it’s one, two, three strikes, you’re out”.

His bondable bail remains $750,000, set during his arraignment on Wednesday, 31 March. Scheduled to appear in court on 5 April (via Zoom), Driver was meant to appear in court next on 10 May, but that has been changed to this Friday, 8 April.

The case continues to unfold.

If you have any information about the case or about Troy Driver, please call the Lyon County Sheriff’s Office at 775-463-6620 and use reference case number 22LY01068. If you prefer to remain anonymous, there is Secret Witness; call 775-322-4900.

Featured

The Creepy Tale of the Slender Man Would-Be Killers

Remember the Slender Man case? When Morgan Geyser and Anissa Weier, both just 12, left classmate Payton Leutner for dead in a Wisconsin park?

In a clear-cut case of premeditated murder. Morgan and Anissa invited Peyton to a sleepover, having planned to lure her to the local park the following morning, Saturday, 31 May 2014. The original plan was to kill Payton in the park restroom. But someone might need to use the restroom; Morgan and Anissa hurriedly decided to lure Payton into the woods by suggesting a game of hide-and-seek.

Payton would have bled out if a bicyclist hadn’t spotted a little girl covered in blood and dialed 911. Despite barely clinging to life, stabbed 19 times in her arms, legs and torso, Payton had managed to crawl to a bike path. The surgeon who saved her life would tell her and her parents that if one knife wound was just a millimeter closer to an artery in her heart, she would have died.

Payton, Morgan and Anissa c. 2014.

Anissa helped Morgan pin Payton down, handed the knife over and told her what to do. Not quite what she told the police hours after the attack, sobbing uncontrollably as reality hit her straight in the face. Sentenced in September 2017 to a maximum of 25 years in a state psychiatric hospital after pleading guilty to attempted second-degree homicide (while convicted, the jury found her ‘not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect’), Anissa walks among us now, granted conditional release in July 2021. (Morgan Geyser too was convicted after being found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, having pleaded guilty to attempted first-degree murder; she was sentenced to 40 years in a psychiatric hospital.)

Morgan Geyser.

Make no mistake, Anissa has always wanted out. Confined to the Winnebago Mental Health Institute in Oshkosh, Wisconsin since December 2017, Anissa, now 19, petitioned the court for conditional release early this year; it was granted after three psychiatrists informed Waukesha County Circuit Judge Michael Bohren in writing that she exhibits no signs of psychosis. And Anissa submitted a letter to the court, claiming to ‘…have exhausted all the resources available to me at the Winnebago Mental Health Institute,’ adding: ‘If I am to become a productive member of society, I need to be a part of society.’

Judge Bohren does not consider Anissa a threat to society and said so, ordering her to be released after 60 days, ample time in which to decide where she would live and how she will support herself.

Anissa Weier, 2021.

She is required to continue with therapy and medication and will remain under state supervision until 2039, when she will be 37 years old.

Lucky Anissa, serving 3 1/2 years for premeditated murder, ordering a so-called friend to do the dirty work. Breathtaking, absolutely breathtaking. With friends like Anissa, who needs enemies? Not that Morgan Geyser is blameless; she appeared to relish the attention she received when interviewed by the police, having, along with Anissa, left Payton Leutner to bleed to death in a forest hours earlier.

Payton’s parents decided to comment after Judge Bohren ordered Anissa released.

‘Our family has worked very closely with the Waukesha District Attorney’s office throughout this process and we are aware of the pending conditional release,” Stacie and Joe Leutner said in a prepared statement. ‘Through this entire ordeal, we have continued to place Payton’s safety and the safety of the community as our top priorities and those priorities will not change.’

Payton will never be the same, revealing five years after the attacks that she sleeps with a pair of broken scissors under her pillow every night ‘just in case’. Yet she is remarkably positive in her outlook, saying she would ‘thank’ Morgan Geyser because the stabbing led to her devising ‘a plan’ for her life, ‘because of everything I went through.’. Today, Payton is an exceptionally happy person who clearly enjoys her life. She once considered Morgan her best friend, having approached her after seeing her eat lunch alone at school. They bonded quickly, as Payton recalled in 2019:

‘She had a lot of jokes to tell,” she remembered. ‘…[Morgan] was great at drawing and her imagination always kept things fun.’

If only Payton had known that Morgan was using search engines to plan a psychiatric defence for murder. Both she and Anissa wanted Payton dead, but Morgan at least anticipated the possibility of being caught.

And caught they were, Morgan and Anissa found together at a furniture store near a highway, having wandered 4.9 miles from where they left Payton, carrying the murder weapon in a bag.

Both insisted that they tried to kill Peyton to please Slender Man.

There was just one problem: there is no Slender Man.

An artist’s view of Slender Man.

Slender Man is just one of many popular legends on the Internet, a very tall and thin man with no hair and no facial features, invariably wearing a black suit; he traumatises/abducts children for fun. Never existed; created by an online forum in 2009. And as if the cyber version of a game of Chinese Whispers, the legend grew all out of proportion

Morgan and Anissa read about Slender Man on the internet. Morgan in particular ran with it, but both she and Anissa decided to justify murdering Payton – they did not believe she would survive – play telling the police that they had to please Slender Man; when apprehended, they claimed to be en route to him.

Morgan had prepared her story and was sticking to it, laying the groundwork for a psychiatric defence that mitigated the sentences of both girls, tried separately and tried as adults. Anissa went further when attempting to explain her actions to stunned police detectives, saying Slender Man has threatened to hurt their families if they did not kill ‘Bella’ their nickname for Payton. That and the tears she shed during her interview – Morgan was his cool at the proverbial cucumber – made Anissa seem the more sympathetic of the two.

And she was smart enough not to touch the knife after handing it to Morgan. How cunning for one so young.

How anyone could have believed that either girl was mentally ill is quite beyond me; however, I recognise that most people, myself included, find the idea of a pair of 12-year-olds murdering another 12-year-old absolutely horrific, so deeply disturbing that the only rational explanation is that both perpetrators were suffering from mental illness, at least at the time.

How about this instead: Morgan and Anissa are not mentally ill – Anissa has certainly made quite a recovery – but evil. Two evil preteens who did their best to end the life of a bright, cheerful and sweet-tempered classmate. And Anissa gave just 3 1/2 years of her life in exchange. Morgan, who admitted to ‘tackling’ and ‘stabbing’ Payton, breezily telling police: ‘I might as well just say it, we were trying to kill her,’ has not yet been conditionally released, her appeal denied in late 2020. But Anissa’s release must have given her hope; surely another appeal is on the way.




Featured

Robert Durst Found Guilty of the First-Degree Murder of Susan Berman

Robert Durst, 78, an heir to a New York real estate fortune, was found guilty on the 17th of September in Los Angeles of the first-degree murder of his close friend Susan Berman.

Opening statements were heard on 12 April 2021; Durst should have been tried in 2020, but the date was moved forward due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

In a fair and just world, Durst would have been tried and convicted almost two decades ago.

Is this a fair and just world? I think not: Durst may lift himself, Lazarus-like, out of his wheelchair and walk away from a courtroom a free man, and for the second time. Why not? He admittedly dismembered a man he claimed to have killed in self-defense in 2001. The jury believed him and Durst was acquitted.

But his luck ran out when after he was recorded saying “Killed them all, of course,” during the filming of a documentary about him. Stupid, very stupid. But Dost is a classic narcissist who Not only was unable to resist the idea of participating in a documentary about him, he has always believed himself far more clever than anyone else he came into contact with.

there is a God colon Durst was convicted for the murder of his closest friend Susan Berman and with any luck perhaps the miracle is required his wife Kathy Baldy will be found where it’s said to be in New Jersey.

Durst met Susan Berman at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) where he was taking graduate-level courses. She was born in Minneapolis but brought up in Las Vegas and Los Angeles, where she attended private school. Her father was David Berman, a well-known gangster, a partner of Bugsy Siegel. Berman replaced Siegel at the famed Flamingo Hotel in Las Vegas after his friend was murdered in Beverly Hills in 1947. Susan was two at the time. Her indulgent father had her portrait painted been prominently displayed at reception at the Flamingo. Berman showered his only child with toys; Susan was treated like a little princess at the Flamingo, where she routinely pass the time by playing gin with her father’s bodyguards. Liberace sang at her birthday party.

Everything changed after Berman suffered a massive heart attack on an operating table in 1957. (Susan liked to say that the Mafia bumped him off.) Her mother committed suicide the following year; this would cement her friendship with Durst, whose mother took her life when he was eight years old.

Susan Berman and Robert Durst, 1990s.

Susan graduated from UCLA in 1967, going to University of California, Berkeley for her master’s in journalism. She worked as a reporter for the San Francisco Examiner and wrote a college guide book, but did little else until after moving to New York in 1980, writing articles for New York magazine before her memoir Easy Street was published in 1981. Represented by the William Morris Agency, she received $350,000 for the film rights, but no film was ever made.

Susan wrote Easy Street because she needed the money, having frittered away $4,300,000 derived from her father’s interests in casinos and real estate. One clue to the mismanagement of what most people would consider a small fortune was her insistence that the life story of Alfred Dreyfus would make a good musical. (Durst declined to invest in it.)

In February 1982, a doorman at the an apartment building in E. 86th Street would tell police he saw Robert Durst’s wife Kathie the first week of February. So did the super. But only from the back and about half a block away; neither he nor the doorman were absolutely certain it was she.

Was this Susan, wearing a blond wig to impersonate Kathy? If so, she knowingly made it appear that Kathie was alive the first week of February; Durst almost certainly murdered her on 31 January.

On Monday, 1 February, a woman identifying herself as Kathie rang the associate dean’s office at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine saying she was ill. Complaining of diarrhoea and nausea, she said she wouldn’t be in class. The associate dean remembered the call because it was unusual: any student that was ill would have contacted the clinic supervisor, not the associate dean.

Kathie would have known that. Whoever made the call did not.

Kathie’s late friend Gilberte Najamy believed Susan made the call. For the record, so do I.

Susan was very helpful to Durst after Kathie disappeared, not only taking on the role of media spokesperson, but actively promulgating his alibi, even seeking to gain sympathy from the police for him, saying Kathie was a cocaine “addict” (her friends say she was a recreational user, not an “addict”) and her disappearance was drug-related. And if that weren’t enough, Susan claimed Kathie confided in her, admitting that she intended to “provoke Bobby to physically abuse her in public to get a better [divorce] settlement”.

Then she had the audacity to say that she was Kathie’s best friend.

But Kathie’s friends said she confronted Durst after he beat her badly enough to send her to hospital just three weeks before she vanished. She wasn’t interested in filing a police report; Kathie wanted a divorce and a settlement of $250,000. Contrary to what Susan said, Kathie was not greedy: she was a fourth-year medical student who needed to support herself as an intern and a resident and after qualifying, anticipated that it could take a while to get her practice up and running. Given what Durst did to her, Kathie could have asked for much more: the Dursts were one of the wealthiest families in New York.

Surely Susan suspected her old friend made his wife vanish into thin air. She may even have known for certain that he murdered her. Yet she willingly became an accessory after the fact. Why? For starters, Susan needed money. And she may have been jealous of Kathie because Durst married Kathie, not her. Did Susan envy a younger, much prettier woman about to embark on what was bound to be a successful career, one who just happened to be married to a wealthy man she was, at the very least, fond of?

No, of course not.

Susan helped Durst yet again when Kathie’s family filed a lawsuit, dismissing her as a failing medical student consumed by depression, who sought comfort in a bottle.

While Susan Berman behaved deplorably, she did not deserve to be murdered, shot execution-style in the back of the head. At 55, she was rather isolated and her body might not have been as soon as it was if not for her neighbours, who noticed one of her terriers wandering outside the house and called the police.

The police believed that she knew her killer; there was no evidence of a break-in.

A friend revealed that just one day before the murder, Susan said she had information “that’s going to blow the top off things.”

Durst reportedly admitted telling Susan he murdered Kathie; was that what she was referring to?

Durst gave Susan $50,000 shortly before her death, split into two cheques the first signed after she wrote a letter to him as his Los Angeles office in August 2000. Susan was almost broke; the memoir about her long-forgotten gangster didn’t exactly fly off bookstore shelves. Then there was her brilliant idea about turning the Dreyfus Affair into a musical; Susan drained her trust fund by pursuing her highly unrealistic dream of turning that unfortunate episode in French history into a Broadway hit; friends remember how she was always just steps away from making a deal.

The timing of Durst’s largesse is interesting: in the fall of 2000, the New York State Police reopened the investigation into Kathie’s disappearance at the request of Westchester County district attorney Jeanine Pirro. (Pirro is now the host of Justice with Judge Pirro on the Fox News Channel.) Pirro was wonderfully thorough, refusing to leave leave any stone unturned, even interviewing Durst’s brother Douglas. Characteristically blunt, she said Durst wasn’t clever enough to dispose of the body on his own; that the Dursts must have helped him. For the record, Douglas Durst denied any involvement.

Pirro would take credit for the arrest of Robert Durst in March 2014 in New Orleans, Where he faced gun charges; after being prosecuted there, he was sent to Los Angeles, having been indicted for the first-degree murder of Susan Berman. She even wrote a book about Durst, He Killed Them All: Robert Durst and My Quest for Justice, published in 2015.

This was after he was tried and acquitted for the murder of Morris Black in Galveston, Texas in 2003.

Durst is a serial killer.

Susan had no one to blame but herself for attracting the attention of law enforcement, having been so very helpful to Durst after Kathie disappeared. Once she knew speaking to investigators loomed on the horizon, Susan would have contacted Durst. There are those who believe that the $50,000 he sent her was a bribe. (Her friends scoff at this.) I believe it was. Furthermore, Susan appears to have expected further financial aid, writing to Durst yet again on 5 November 2000, but said she hoped asking for money would not mar their friendship. Was she hinting at further requests? Susan was in a position to send Durst to prison for life; in short, she knew far too much about his dark side.

Durst sent her a check for $25,000. Susan must have been relieved, but was upset nonetheless, not having recovered from her recent financial troubles: when she asked for help in August, Susan could not pay her rent and was on the verge of eviction.

Durst would not have responded to Susan’s latest plea had he not learned on 31 October, that the investigation into Kathie’s disappearance had been reopened. He was getting ready to live off the grid, living the life of a fugitive. Clearly, he did not believe that Susan would continue to lie for him, belatedly arising at that conclusion only after sending her two cheques totaling $50,000.

If Susan told the investigators what she knew, he would go to prison for the rest of his life.

Small wonder she ended up dead less before investigators had a chance to question her about Kathie. It is a shame that it took 21 years for Durst to be brought to justice.

A sentencing hearing is scheduled for 18 October.





Featured

Peter Sutcliffe Is Dead

On 13 November, Britons woke to the excellent news that one of the country’s most notorious serial killers was dead.

Peter Sutcliffe died on Friday, 13 November after contracting COVID-19. He refused treatment, literally signing his life away. He died alone; no one was at his bedside.

One less lifer at HMP (Her Majesty’s Prison) Frankland. 

Sutcliffe was at risk for contracting the virus as an elderly and obese diabetic.

Well, if anyone had to die of it…

Peter Sutcliffe murdered at least thirteen women and attempted to kill at least seven more, cynically preying on sex workers, vulnerable as they are, well aware that many would not think twice about getting into a car with a strange man.

Peter William Sutcliffe was born 2 June 1946 in Bingley in the West Riding of Yorkshire.  Leaving school at fifteen, he took one poorly paid job after another, including two stints as a gravedigger.

A fellow worker noticed that Sutcliffe routinely stole took jewellery and articles of clothing from the corpses. On one memorable occasion, he threw a stone at an open coffin, laughing: ‘It’ll wake them up!’.

There were even whispers of necrophilia.

By this time, Sutcliffe was obsessed with sex workers.  He’d started spying on sex workers at fifteen. His domineering father John was outwardly prurient, so perhaps this fixation was a secret act of rebellion. Sutcliffe, the youngest of six, always worried that he fell far short of his father’s expectations. And given the fact that he adored his mother, he must have deeply resented how badly his father treated her.

Sutcliffe watched his father grope his brothers’ girlfriends, the reason he permitted sleepovers under his roof once the boys started dating.

Meanwhile, Kathleen Sutcliffe put up and shut up. But when Sutcliffe was in his early twenties, she found the courage to embark upon an affair with a policeman.

John Sutcliffe found out and went spare, venting to Peter, who still lived at home. Then he devised a plan for revenge, booking a room in a hotel, arranging matters so Kathleen would think she’d be meeting her lover. She went to the hotel and up to the room and knocked. John Sutcliffe opened the door. Worse, Peter was standing behind him.

Sutcliffe had a pronounced Madonna/whore complex and this traumatic incident didn’t help matters.

1969

At twenty-three, Sutcliffe had a girlfriend he’d been courting for two years. He saw Sonia every Saturday night and having a possessive nature, was outraged when he learned that she was two-timing him. Rather than confronting her, Sutcliffe decided to go to the red light district and solicit a sex worker. It was a bizarre idea of revenge, sleeping with a sex worker behind your girlfriend’s back. 

The woman he approached asked for five pounds. Sutcliffe gave her ten, assuming he would receive his change later on.  Nothing happened; Sutcliffe may not have been able to perform. As he was leaving, he asked for his money. But the woman had protectors who intervened, telling him in no uncertain terms to be on his way. 

Three weeks later, he asked his friend Trevor Birdsall to drive him through the red-light district, looking for the woman who had cheated him. Spotting her, he asked Birdsall to pull over. Sutcliffe was gone for ten minutes; when he returned, he was noticeably out of breath and clearly anxious, urging Birdsall to drive away.

Sutcliffe said he’s going to sue the woman but ended up attacking another sex worker instead, hitting her over the head with a sock loaded with a stone. Worried that the ‘old cow’ would go to the police, Sutcliffe shook the sock out the passenger side window.

And so she did, having memorising the number plate.

The police paid Birdsall a visit. Panic-stricken, he told them everything he knew.

Then the police went to see Sutcliffe. He received a stern lecture, but nothing more, because the woman declined to press charges. She may have worried that as a known sex worker that she would not be believed in court. And despite reporting the incident, she may have be wary of them, with a common-law husband in prison for assault. 

The police told Sutcliffe he was very lucky.

His luck gave out just weeks later.

Sutcliffe was found by police in Manningham (Bradford) on 29 September hiding behind a hedge with a hammer. Having no idea he’d gone there to solicit a sex worker and kill her, the police mistook him for a burglar. He was fined twenty-five pounds.

The police never found the long-bladed knife he dropped down a gap in the police van, the first time Sutcliffe would hide a weapon under their noses, but not the last.

1975

Sutcliffe was advised to go to Keighley in Bradford by his fellow workers on the night shift at Britannia Works of Anderton International as there were plenty of sex workers there.  Sutcliffe and Sonia had been married for a year, but his obsession with sex workers continued unabated.

He spotted Anna Rogulskyj in Keighley.

Sutcliffe boldly approached her asking if he could go home with her for a cuppa.  She refused. Not only was his request bizarre, this man was wild-eyed; something was clearly very wrong. Anna quickly walked away. Alarmed when she realised Sutcliffe was following her, she made an effort to lose him. 

Several weeks later, he followed Anna straight into a coffee bar. Frightened, she refused to have coffee with him and was about to make a fuss when he bolted.

On Saturday, 5 July at about 1:00 a.m., Anna was in North Queen Street on her way to see her boyfriend. A man in a darkened doorway asked if she ‘fancied it’.   ‘Not on your life’, she replied, continuing on her way, but walking double time now.

Anna arrived at her boyfriend’s house, but could not awaken him.  Frustrated and emotional and drunk, she threw a shoe through a ground floor window before walking home.

Then she heard the voice ask again if she ‘fancied it’.  For the second time, Anna said no.

Then she heard someone running behind her.

Sutcliffe rushed towards her from behind; an alert Anna elbowed him.  Undaunted, he hit her three times over the head with a ball peen hammer before she collapsed.  Whilst unconscious, Sutcliffe pulled her blouse up and slashed her abdomen with a knife; only a neighbour calling out into the night prevented a stabbing frenzy.  He ran off, the neighbour went back to sleep and Anna lay unconscious, bleeding onto the pavement for almost an hour before she was found.  Miraculously, she survived, but was so badly injured that she was given the last rites. A twelve-hour-long operation to remove splinters of bone from her brain saved her life.

The encounter taught Sutcliffe the value of approaching lone women from behind. 

In August, he ambushed forty-six-year old office cleaner Olive Smelt in Halifax.

Olive was on her way home, dropped off by a friend after an evening out. Sutcliffe came near, close enough for her to hear him ask: ‘Weather’s letting us down, isn’t it?’

Olive politely replied in the affirmative.

The next thing she knew, she was in hospital, her head swathed in bandages. She was not expected to survive. Sutcliffe had hit her over the head so ferociously that her skull ‘was like a crushed coconut shell’ as she recalled many years later. Years later, Sutcliffe admitted he intended to kill Olive and would have had he not been caught in the headlights of a passing car.

She told the police that the man had thick black hair and a Yorkshire accent. But they refused to believe he was from Yorkshire; it took two years to realise that she was correct. This upset her. ‘If they had taken me seriously, I believe he could have been caught earlier.’

Later that month, Sutcliffe attacked fourteen-year-old Tracy Browne in Silsden. Once again, he was scared off by a passing car. Tracy had brain surgery and survived, never knowing who attacked her until 1992, when Sutcliffe finally confessed.

On Thursday, 30 October, he was on the prowl again, this time in Leeds. 

Wilma McCann was 28, born in Scotland. Life in Leeds was hard with four children, no education to speak of and no skills. It was difficult to make ends meet and Wilma drifted into sex work.

That evening, Wilma said goodnight to her children before going went out. Drifting from pub to pub, she downed between twelve and fourteen measures of spirits. After leaving the last pub at 10:30 p.m. (closing time during the week), witnesses saw her with a portion of chips (French fries) in her hand in the road, weaving in and out of traffic.  A concerned lorry driver was about to give her a lift, but changed his mind after Wilma began hurling abuse. 

(What follows is Sutcliffe’s version of events; please bear this in mind.)

Sutcliffe, seeing a vulnerable woman, hastily pulled over and told her to jump in.  Once seated, she said she lived nearby before thanking for stopping.  According to him, they chatted amiably (rather difficult to believe since a witness described her as ‘incoherent’) until Wilma asked if he ‘want[ed] business’.  Sutcliffe later told police he didn’t know what that meant.  ‘I asked her to explain and straight away a scornful tone came into her voice, which took me by surprise because she had been so pleasant.’  According to him, Wilma retorted:  ‘Bloody hell, do I have to spell it out?’ 

He parked 100 yards away from her house, where her children were fast asleep. According to him, Wilma was impatient, demanding: ‘Well, what are we waiting for? ‘Let’s get on with it.’. She asked for five pounds.  Sutcliffe was annoyed. He was in no hurry. On the contrary, he needed time to warm up.  By now, Wilma was absolutely furious.  Getting out of the car, she slammed the door and shouted ‘I’m going, it’s going to take you all fucking day!’  Then she ‘said something like “You’re fucking useless”‘.  

This set him off. Now he was ‘seething with rage’ and admittedly longed to hit Wilma.

One suspects Sutcliffe was incapable of performing with women and Wilma’s remark served as a reminder.

According to his version of events, he responded with: ‘Hang on a minute, don’t go off like that’.  There wasn’t much room in the car; perhaps he they ought to go to the playing fields.  Wilma, still in a foul mood, stomped up the hill.  Sutcliffe followed.  He spread his coat on the grass. She sat down, then ‘…unfastened her trousers.  She said: ‘Come on then, get it over with.’

‘Don’t worry, I will.’

‘After that first time, I developed and played up a hatred for prostitutes in order to justify within myself a reason why I had attacked and killed Wilma McCann.’

1976

Sutcliffe struck again the following winter in Leeds. 

Emily and Sydney Jackson were a middle-aged couple and the parents of three children. Caught in a financial bind, they agreed that Emily would take on sex work part-time, using the van Sydney used as a roofing contractor. Oddly, he did not drive: Emily drove him to work and made herself very helpful to her husband in other ways, including keeping his paperwork straight. Sydney appears to have taken his wife for granted; the couple went to a pub nightly and while he sat inside drinking, oh, Emily stood outside the pub waiting for a client, no matter how inclement the weather.

Sutcliffe noticed her outside the Gaiety pub in Roundhay Road on Tuesday, 20 January. The idea of warming herself in a car must have been very tempting, so tempting that Emily jumped in.

Sutcliffe drove to a site he’d clearly chosen in advance, a derelict building on an industrial estate.  It was about half past seven on a winter’s evening in the north of England and Enfield Street seemed completely abandoned. 

Sutcliffe stopped the car and within seconds, hit Emily over the head with a hammer. Unconscious, he dragged her into a rubbish-strewn yard and unbuttoned her coat before pulling up her blouse and brassiere to expose her breasts.  Then he raised her skirt and stabbed her fifty-two times in the neck, the chest, the abdomen and the back with a Phillips screwdriver.  Rummaging through the yard, Sutcliffe came across a piece of wood two to three feet long.  The police found it rammed up between her legs. 

He’d left a clue: an impression of his Wellington boot on Emily’s thigh.  (Years later in California, Richard Ramirez, the notorious Night Stalker, similarly left an impression of his shoe on a victim’s face, an act of brutality that shocked seasoned detectives.)

Sydney emerged from the pub at ten-thirty. Looking for Emily, he walked to the van.  Assuming she was with a client, he hailed a taxi and went home. 

Sutcliffe went back to Leeds four months later.

Marcella Claxton was twenty and four months pregnant, walking home alone from a party on Sunday 9 May at 4:00 am. Despite her pregnancy, Marcella had been drinking heavily. Sutcliffe must have noticed, because he pulled over. Marcella asked for a lift. 

What happened next is not certain; Marcella denies soliciting that morning. Sutcliffe said she agreed to go to Soldier’s Field in Roundhay Park for sex and asked for five pounds.  Marcella says she never said any such thing. What is certain is that he drove to the Field; both Marcella and Sutcliffe agreed that she went behind ‘some trees to relieve herself, Sutcliffe adding that she assured him they would ‘start the ball rolling on the grass’.

Then he accidentally dropped his hammer.

Marcella, after hearing the thud, called out: ‘I hope that isn’t a knife.’   Sutcliffe replied that he’d dropped his wallet. 

He struck from behind as he always did, hitting Marcella eight or nine times over the head with his ball peen hammer.  Remarkably, she did not lose consciousness and witnessed Sutcliffe masturbating a few feet away before thrusting a five pound note in her hand, warning her not to go to the police. 

She waited until he drove off.  Staggering in agony and covered in blood, Marcella went to the nearest phone box and stepped inside. 

Then, in a scene worthy of a horror film, she saw Sutcliffe driving back, clearly looking for her. Marcella realised he’d thought better of letting her live and was coming back ‘to finish me off’.

What made her situation all the more terrifying was the knowledge that she could not run away, weak as she was from blood loss. But weakness forced Marcella to sink to the cement floor of the phone box; she was well out of sight.

Fifty-two stitches were required to suture her wounds.  She underwent brain surgery.  And Marcella lost her baby.  But her memory was intact. Marcella gave police a description of a bearded man with ‘crinkly’ black hair and a Yorkshire accent who drove a white car with red upholstery. 

1977

Sutcliffe waited until Saturday, 5 February 1977 to attack another woman in Leeds. 

Irene Richardson, 28, was down on her luck. Once a chambermaid, she was unemployed. She had one child, a son that she gave up for adoption seven years earlier. The last ten days had been particularly bad and Irene was desperate for money.

She was waiting for a client outside the Gaiety pub that evening, standing exactly where Emily Jackson stood a year earlier.

At half past eleven, Sutcliffe caught her attention. Irene cheerfully hopped in and after promising to ‘show him a good time’, poignantly asked: ‘You are not going to send me away, are you?’

No, he had no intention of sending her away.

Sutcliffe drove down Roundhay Road to Roundhay Park, continuing on to Soldier’s Field, where he killed Wilma McCann and very nearly ended Marcella Claxton’s life. Irene needed to urinate, settling for the grass after finding the lavatories locked.

Irene Richardson never had a chance.

The following morning, a jogger, startled to see a woman lying face down on the Field cold to her asking her if she was all right. When she did not reply, he went to her. Brushing her blood-soaked hair back from her face, he saw glazed-over eyes and a rivulet of blood on her neck.

Sutcliffe left another clue by stupidly parking his car on the grass. If only the police had grasped how thoroughly he enjoyed murdering sex workers.

‘[It was] an obsession with me and I couldn’t stop myself, it was like some sort of drug.’

Sutcliffe kept up with himself in the press and decided the next time he killed a sex worker it would be in Manningham, in Bradford. 

Patricia Atkinson was in her early thirties. Preferring to call herself Tina, she had a habit of self-medicating with alcohol. On Saturday, 23 April, Tina went on a solitary pub crawl, getting so drunk that an exasperated pub manager threw her out. Frustrated and utterly miserable, she was pounding the roof of a car and shouting obscenities when Sutcliffe saw her. Delighted to be offered a ride, she fairly leapt in the car, quick to tell the driver that her flat was nearby.  Well aware that a man was murdering sex workers in the north of England, Tina thought it would be safer to take clients home.

She died around a quarter past eleven.

Once again, Sutcliffe left a clue, a bloody boot print on the bedclothes that linked this latest murder to that of Emily Jackson.

Sutcliffe returned to Leeds early the morning of 26 June.

Hours later, two children found sixteen-year-old Jayne McDonald face down in an adventure playground. She was not far from home; by a morbid coincidence, Jayne was a neighbour of the McCanns. A school leaver, she was a shop assistant, but since Sutcliffe watched her walk through a red light district, he assumed she was a sex worker.

The police turned the body over and saw a broken glass bottle embedded in her chest, a desecration Sutcliffe would refuse to take responsibility for, insisting it happened when he dragged Jayne to the playground from the road. 

The burden of identification fell on her father.  He died two years later, of a broken heart.

1977-80

The West Yorkshire Police failed to go on television and appeal to the public on television until after building society clerk Josephine Whitaker was murdered on 4 April. The Yorkshire Ripper – as the tabloid press called him – had gone too far this time, choosing a victim who was not a sex worker for the second time. Chief Superintendent Jim Hobson of West Yorkshire police made his views on the matter all too clear:

‘He [Sutcliffe] has made it clear that he hates prostitutes.’ Hobson remarked, continuing with: ‘Many people do. We, as a police force will continue to arrest prostitutes. But the Ripper is now killing innocent girls.’

Feminists were outraged. There were protests complete with placards reading: ‘Prostitutes are innocent, OK?’ But changing deeply ingrained attitudes was an uphill battle.

Nineteen-year-old Josephine Whitaker had lived in Halifax and went to see her grandparents the evening of 4 April, delightedly showing off the new silver watch she’d bought. They asked her to stay the night, but with her contact lens case and solution at home, Josephine turned the request down.

It was eleven-forty. Sutcliffe had been drinking with Trevor Birdsall; they parted after closing time, Sutcliffe stressing that he had to go home. But he went in the opposite direction, in search of a victim.

Within minutes, he spotted Josephine walking alone.

Sutcliffe claimed he felt guilty after murdering Josephine and Jayne before her because neither was a sex worker. But he chatted with Josephine before killing her and admitted that she said she was walking home from her grandparents, adding that it was a long walk. Sutcliffe knew perfectly well that Josephine was not a sex worker.

In my opinion, Sutcliffe was less interested in murdering sex workers than murdering vulnerable women.

Returning briefly to the attitudes held by West Yorkshire Police at the time, it would be unfair not to mention that the present Chief Constable issued an apology immediately after Sutcliffe died, regretting ‘the language, tone and terminology used by senior officers at the time.’.

John Robins continued with: ‘Such language and attitudes may have reflected wider societal attitudes of the day, but it was as wrong then as it is now.’

With all due respect to Mr. Robins, that was a day late and a dollar short.

As Sutcliffe continued to murder, the press taunted West Yorkshire Police; one observation quickly became infamous: ‘Ripper 10, police nil.’ Sutcliffe was one of the most prolific serial killers in British history by the spring of 1979. Four more women lost their lives after Jayne McDonald was murdered and before Josephine Whitaker’s body was found.

– Jean Jordan, 21. Murdered in Manchester on 1 October 1977.
– Yvonne Pearson, 22. Murdered in Bradford on 21 January 1978.
– Helen Rytka, 18. Murdered in Huddersfield on 31 January 1978.
– Vera Millward, 40. Murdered in Manchester on 16 May 1978.  

And there would have been two more victims in that space of time if Maureen Long and Marilyn Moore hadn’t survived.

Sutcliffe attacked Maureen in Bradford on 10 July 1977, leaving her for dead as he drove away.  Maureen was forty-two, a sex worker who lived in Leeds but had gone to Bradford on 9 July for a night on the town.  Worse for the wear, she accepted the lift Sutcliffe offered her,  asking if he ‘fancied’ her. 

‘Yes’, he replied.

She was found the following morning on a stretch of waste ground, barely alive, hit over the head with a hammer and stabbed and left exposed. Maureen survived, but could not accurately describe the man who attacked her. 

Sutcliffe panicked after reading in the newspaper that Maureen was alive and got rid of the hammer, tossing it over a wall.  A groundskeeper found it and used it for the next three years, having no idea what it was used for.

He went to Leeds on 14 December 1977. This time he was prepared, having chosen twenty-five-year-old Marilyn Moore as his next victim in advance. He casually dropped the names of two fellow sex workers, mentioning one had a Jamaican boyfriend, so Marilyn would drop her guard and get into his car. 

They were about 200 yards away from where Wilma McCann died when Sutcliffe suddenly began calling Marilyn names. Then he hit her in the head with a hammer.  Marilyn knew how important it was to protect her head, so raised her arms. And she screamed, hoping to attract attention. A dog barked in the distance, unnerving Sutcliffe enough to shove Marilyn out of the car and drive off as quickly as he could.

Marilyn was not only observant, but had an excellent memory. Thanks to her, the police had their first accurate description of the Yorkshire Ripper: dark curly hair, dark eyes, height about 5’6″.  (The only mistake she made was to say he had a Liverpool accent.) The photo fit based on the information she provided was astonishingly accurate and anyone who knew Sutcliffe would have known he was the Yorkshire Ripper.

But his old friend Trevor Birdsall failed come forward until November 1980. Had he done the right thing in the summer of 1979 at the latest, he might have saved the lives of three women:


– Barbara Leach, 20, a student at Bradford University. She died on 1 September 1979.
– Marguerite Walls, 47. A civil servant, she died on 20 August 1980 in Leeds.
– Jacqueline Hill, 20, a student at Leeds University, murdered on 17 November 1980. 

Along the way, Sutcliffe attacked three other women who survived.

Birdsall revealed what he thought he knew in an anonymous note sent to police only in the hope of receiving a £50,000 reward. Maddeningly, the note was literally lost in the shuffle, thrust into a file and forgotten. But then again, West Yorkshire Police mishandled the case full stop; Assistant Chief Constable George Oldfield should never have been placed in charge. Oldfield fell hook, line and sinker for letters and a tape sent by a hoaxer soon nicknamed Wearside Jack. The tape convinced Oldfield that the Ripper was a Geordie – from Newcastle – living and working in Bradford. FBI profiler Robert Ressler (who inspired the Netflix series Mindhunter) heard the tape and and knew immediately that Wearside Jack was a hoaxer. But Oldfield had made up his mind. Even after Sutcliffe was arrested, Oldfield remained convinced that the letters and tape had been sent by the Ripper.

Oldfield had a heart attack in August 1979. The official reason for his four-month long absence was a chest infection. He returned to work, but was no longer in charge of the Ripper case.


On 2 January 1980, a policeman showing a rookie the ropes in Broomhill, Sheffield (South Yorkshire) saw a couple sitting in a car in a driveway in Melbourne Avenue. It was late, and it was a red-light district. The police went over to investigate.

Sutcliffe told police his name was John Williams when the older policeman asked what who the girl was, stop Cliff replied that she was his girlfriend when asked what her name was he said he hadn’t known her that long angering his interlocutor. ‘Do you think I just fell off a Christmas tree?’ he retorted.

Meanwhile, the rookie checked the number plates and discovered they were false, meant to be on a car registered to a man with a Pakistani surname. Ordered out of his car, Sutcliffe complied before announcing he needed to urinate. Watching him wander slightly off course, Sergeant Robert Ring asked where he was going. Sutcliffe ignored the question, complaining he was ‘bursting for a pee’. Annoyed, Sergeant waved him towards a wall.

Observant police officers at the station house noticed that he matched the description of the Ripper, including the gap in his front teeth, having bitten two of his murder victims A blood test revealed that Sutcliffe and the Ripper shared the same blood group, B. This was rare in Britain at the time, applying to just 6% of the population. 

South Yorkshire Police kept him overnight, sending Sutcliffe to West Yorkshire Police the next day.  But Sergeant Ring was troubled: something wasn’t right. On a hunch, he decided to return to Melbourne Avenue and went to where Sutcliffe relieved himself. He found a ball-peen hammer and a knife behind a storage tank; another knife would be found in the lavatory at the station house. 

When taken to West Yorkshire Police to be interviewed, it was not the first time Sutcliffe was interviewed as a Ripper suspect – far from it.  West Yorkshire Police interviewed him nine times over the years, three times in one calendar year, yet Sutcliffe was never a leading suspect. 

Tyre tracks and a £5 note to the first interview.

Sutcliffe left tyre tracks at the scene of the Richardson murder. That was avoidable; he should not have driven on the grass. Nor should he have left the £5 note he gave Jean Jordan on 1 October 1977 behind, but he never found her handbag; police found it in a garden meters away from the body.

It was a new five pound note and working with the banks, the police discovered that it could have been slipped into any one of 300 pay packets. Sutcliffe was on the list. He was interviewed at home on 2 November 1977. Sutcliffe said he was in bed by 11:30 pm the night Jean Jordan was murdered. Wife Sonia backed him up and would again on 8 November later during a second interview, when Sutcliffe said he was at a housewarming party on 9 October. Kathleen Sutcliffe echoed her daughter-in-law. But Sutcliffe had left the party to return to the scene of the crime. Unable to find the £5 note, he took out his frustration on the rotting body, stripping and mutilating it before, in an effort to confuse the authorities, cutting off the head.

Forensics knew for certain that the body had been moved because of fly eggs.

As the late former Home Office pathologist Professor Mike Green (who worked on the Ripper case) explained, certain flies lay their eggs in the sun. Others prefer the shade. The presence of eggs laid by different flies revealed that the body had been moved.

And forensics discovered that the body had been further desecrated on 9 October, prompting the second police interview. Backed up by his wife and mother, Sutcliffe had a solid alibi.

The police interviewed him twice in 1978, on 13 August 1978 and 23 November.

He was interviewed yet again on 29 July 1979 after his car was spotted no less than 36 times in Bradford, twice in Leeds and once in Manchester by Ripper surveillance teams.

Detective Constable Andrew Laptew sensed immediately there was ‘something not quite right about this man.’.

He trotted a certain joke when interviewing suspects at home, turning to the man’s wife and saying: ‘Now’s your chance to get rid of your husband for good.’. It had never failed to get a laugh.

All the Sutcliffes did was stare.

Laptew was perturbed. This couple was not normal and he knew it. His partner, Detective Constable Graham Greenwood, agreed. Laptew wrote a two-page report detailing the suspicions he and Greenwood held, recommending that Sutcliffe be interviewed by senior detectives. It was filed away, destined to languish in a cabinet. To his credit, Laptew would tell a superior he ‘did not like’ Sutcliffe, who could very well be the Ripper. The man responded by giving him a dressing down in front of fifty police officers, warning one and all that anyone who did not believe the Ripper was a Geordie – the official line at the time – would end up directing traffic.

Laptew was humiliated. He even felt ‘stupid’. But he wasn’t wrong.

Sutcliffe was interviewed by police again on 23 October 1979 about his car having been spotted so frequently in red light districts. An inspector Sifting through the Ripper file backlog was not satisfied with the answers Sutcliffe gave. So he was interviewed yet again and samples of his handwriting for the second time.

He was eliminated as a suspect.

Sutcliffe was interviewed for the seventh time at home on 13 January 1980, four months after Barbara Leach was murdered. This time, he had no alibi. This time, the house was searched; his boots and tools in the garage were examined.

Detectives interviewed Sutcliffe alone on 30 January, turning up at work. Even he could not believe they showed him photographs of Josephine Whitaker and the boot print found, yet failed to notice he was wearing the very same pair of boots. Loading his lorry, Sutcliffe realised ‘they could look up and see for themselves that I was wearing those boots. But they didn’t. They couldn’t see what were in front of their own eyes.’

The last interview before his arrest was on the 7th of February 1980. Sutcliffe was questioned at home yet again about his car in red light districts, but calmly gave the detectives alibis. And he had an alibi for his whereabouts the night Josephine Whitaker was murdered, confirmed by the ever-obliging Sonia.

The tenth police interview did not go so well. This time, Sutcliffe had been arrested and was in a station house answering questions.

It took twenty-four hours for him to confess, possibly prompted by a strip-search that revealed an essential part of his kill kit, an inverted v-neck pullover that left his genitals exposed under his trousers. When asked what he was wearing, Sutcliffe gave a two word reply:

‘Leg warmers.’

He was hardly like you to reveal that the pullover allowed him to kneel in relative comfort when he masturbated over corpses.

The trial was in London, at the Old Bailey. It lasted just a fortnight; Sutcliffe was found guilty on all counts, the jury ignoring the four psychiatrists (two for the defence, two for the prosecution) who diagnosed him as a paranoid schizophrenic, but listening intently to the testimony of a prison officer. He overheard Sutcliffe tell Sonia that if believed to be mad, he might spend only 10 years in a ‘loony bin’. 

Sutcliffe managed to get himself diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic once again in 1984. Prison did not agree with him. Accordingly, he spent the 32 years at Broadmoor Hospital, until a health tribunal determined he was no longer mentally ill and sent him back to prison, saving taxpayers £250,000 a year.

Was Sutcliffe a paranoid schizophrenic? Or just evil?

He will not be missed. But his victims were missed and continue to be missed today. And Sutcliffe harmed his victims’ families; Neil Jackson bitterly regrets that his mother died without knowing his children and grandchildren. Sonia McCann, depressed for years, felt she had no right to live longer than her mother had. She ended her life at twenty-eight.

The victims were daughters and sisters, mothers and wives and partners. Whether they sex workers or students should never have mattered. But it did to West Yorkshire Police, on the whole preferring to listen to none-too-clever George Oldfield rather than survivors. It was survivor Marilyn Moore, a sex worker, who gave such an accurate description of Sutcliffe that the resultant photo fit looked exactly like him. Yet when Detective Constable Andrew Laptew pointed this out, he was shut down. So Sutcliffe continued to kill until a routine check led to his arrest, ending a five years of terror for hundreds of thousands of women in the north of England.





Featured

Cannibals in a Cabin: A Taste for Testicles

In October 2020, a twenty-eight-year-old year old man appeared at a hospital in McAlester, Oklahoma, his groin soaked in blood. He had an extraordinary tale to tell, claiming to have been held captive by two men in a cabin and allowed to leave only after they had removed both his testicles.

Sheriff’s deputies searched the cabin thoroughly and found surgical equipment, medications, bloody towels and tissues, and lo and behold, a pair of testicles in the freezer. (It must be said that the cannibal had taken the trouble to use a freezer bag.)

The victim told the police he had wanted his testicles removed, so flew from his home in Virginia to Dallas, was picked up at the airport, then driven to a cabin in southeast Oklahoma, where the operation would be performed. (Driven to a cabin to be castrated; yes, you read that correctly.)

Still with me? Good. The victim would never have been in the cabin had he not Googled “castrations” and found what appeared to be a promising website. Registration was necessary and in the registration box was a warm welcome from “the EunuchMaker and the EM Crew”.

The Eunuch Maker was Bob Lee Allen, 54, of Wister, Oklahoma and his crew was just one person, Thomas Evans Gates, 43, also of Wister. Allen sought to reassure the man over the Internet, claiming to have performed gender reassignment surgeries for 15 years. And he was willing to operate at no charge; the only condition was that he be allowed to videotape the surgery “for personal use”. The man agreed, then booked a flight for 11 October 2020.

Allen operated – one uses the word loosely – “on a covered makeshift table” the following day, assisted by Gates, who handed Allen surgical instruments as needed throughout. Only local anaesthetic was used, not general anaesthetic, as one would expect.

After the testicles were removed, Allen laughingly informed the victim that he intended to eat them, freely admitting that he was a cannibal. He continue to torment his victim, saying he had once operated on a “crazy” man, leaving him “opened up to die overnight”. Allen was on a roll, bragging that six more men were en route to be castrated and that he had “a freezer full of body parts”, showing the victim photos on his phone. The tension escalated until Allen and Gates tried “to get him [the victim] to participate in cannibalism”.

Two days later, the victim still bleeding heavily and asked Allen to drive him to a hospital. Allen refused. “No morgue, no ER”. But the victim would not take no for an answer, so Allen drove him, most reluctantly, to the nearest hospital, saying he would “dump” his body in the woods if he died before threatening to leave him alive in the woods if he fainted from blood loss.

After arriving at the hospital, Allen ordered the man to say he had castrated himself before letting him out of the car. Then he drove off, leaving his victim to find his way to the emergency room.

The hospital reported the incident to the authorities immediately. This was on 14 October; Allen and Gates were arrested the following day.

LeFlore County Sheriff Rodney Derryberry made a statement and reassured everyone listening that the public was not in danger and what had occurred was not “cult activity”.

Allen and Gates faced felony counts of conspiracy to perform surgery without a license, performing surgery without a license, maiming, assault and battery “with a dangerous weapon” as well as one misdemeanor count, failure” to bury the parts” they allegedly removed from the victim, whose testicles were discovered by law enforcement in the cabin.

A frightened Gates made a deal, testifying against Allen, who turned out to be his husband. In exchange, the District Attorney’s office dismissed three felony counts against him; Gates pleaded guilty to possession of psychedelic mushrooms, possession of drug paraphernalia and failure to bury the testicles, which were found in a freezer. He was released from jail on Tuesday, 21 September.

Allen, anxious to avoid a jury trial, pleaded no contest to five counts against him. He has been sentenced to two years in jail and 10 years and one month in prison.

However, if Allen told the truth and really did let a mentally ill man die on his makeshift operating overnight after refusing to suture the incisions, where is the body? In the vicinity of the cabin? Or would that have been too close to home? Allen threatened to “dump” the victim in the woods if he fainted, let alone died. Should the woods be searched?

Bob Lee Allen on the left, Thomas Evans Gates on the right.

Featured

The Keddie Cabin Murders

Part of a series dedicated to serial killers and cold cases, state by state.

Keddie, California, 11-12 April 1981

Trigger warning: this is a particularly grisly cold case, one involving the murder of a child.


Keddie, California is a small resort town in the Sierra Nevada mountain range of northern California, with just sixty-six year-round residents. Few Americans had heard of Keddie before 12 April 1981. Today, it is infamous as the site of a triple homicide and the kidnapping of a young girl.

In 1980, Sue Sharp, then 36, left an allegedly abusive husband in Connecticut, taking their five children to California, where they lived in a one-bedroom trailer in Quincy, California that her brother and his wife had vacated before moving into cabin 28 of Keddie Resort Lodge, in Keddie, California, a low income rental, the owners of the once successful resort anxious not to go under.

The cabin was one of several two-story cabins. There were three bedrooms, one for Rick and Greg, one for Sue and Tina while teenagers Sheila and Johnny slept alone, she in the third bedroom, he in the unfinished basement.

The family continued to subsist on welfare and food stamps. James Sharp sent $250 a month in child support. Sue enrolled in a federal program that paid the fees for community college. She studied business and was a very good student, but kept herself to herself, caring about little other than running a business and buying a house for her and her brood.

Back at Keddie Resort, Sue quickly became a subject of gossip. As a pretty and newly single woman, she was asked out frequently, and not everyone was happy for her. There were rumours that she dealt in drugs and engaged in part-time prostitution. Perhaps she did. Or the gossip was completely unfounded. Ambitious Sue had little desire to befriend other welfare recipients, but her children quickly made new friends.

Sheila Sharp spent the night of 11 April 1981 watching television with a friend in the next cabin and her sister Tina, who went home at 9:30 p.m. Sheila planned to go to church the following morning with her friend and her family, so went home at 8:00 a.m. to change into something suitable.

She walked into a scene straight out of a horror film.

Sue, Johnny and his friend Dana Wingate were all dead in the living room, the green carpeting literally soaked in blood. Johnny was closest to the door, hands bound with adhesive tape, his ankles tied with the same electrical cord that bound Dana’s ankles. Panicked, Sheila looked for Rick and Greg. Both were fast asleep. So was another little boy, Justin Smartt.

Then Sheila ran back to the cabin next door. Having no memory of what happened next, she recalls only what the Seabolts told her, that she screamed: ‘It’s Johnny!’ James Seabolt asked no questions, merely took Sheila back to cabin 28. Hoping someone was alive, he entered the house through the open back door and took a look, leaving soon after pulling Sue’s dress down and covering her body with a blanket.

The Seabolts didn’t have a phone, so sent one of their children to the owners’ lodge to tell them what happened. Meanwhile, James Seabolt and Sheila awakened the little boys and gently pulled them through the bedroom window so none would see the carnage in the living room.

Deputy Hank Klement soon arrived.

He noticed that the bodies were moved and knew Sue and the boys had all died a protracted death, all having stepped in pools of blood on the living room floor. Blood was everywhere, on the ivy-patterned wallpaper in the bedroom Sue and Tina shared, outside all the bedroom and on the back stairs handrail. Someone either covered in blood left the house through the back and that person was Tina Sharp and her captors. But no one realised she was gone for hours, possibly only after it was discovered that her jacket and shoes were missing.

Deputy Klement questioned Sheila and the Seabolts; no one heard strange noises during the night. But the Seabolts noticed a green van next to the Sharp cabin at 9:00 p.m., shortly before Tina went home. Another Keddie resident saw a brown Datsun next to the cabin, memorable because one of the tires was almost completely flat. Two other neighbours would report having heard ‘muffled’ screams at 1:30 a.m., but could not say where they came from.

The phone was taken off the hook and the line was cut as one might expect in the event of a burglary. Yet nothing was missing apart from a shoe box used as a tool box.

Blood spatter analysis revealed that all three victims died in the living room, Sue and Dana beaten so forcefully with a claw hammer that blood was found on all four walls and the ceiling.

There were no signs of a break-in. It was a cool early spring night, cold enough for Tina to wear a jacket when the killers took her with them, too cold to leave windows and doors open, so the perpetrators must have been invited in; Sue Sharp knew her killers.

Another reason to believe that the victims died at the hands of people they knew is that deaths were very up close and personal: Sue was bludgeoned and stabbed, gagged with her knickers and left exposed; Johnny was stabbed, but the cause of death was a slit throat. Dana was bludgeoned with a hammer not found at the crime scene before being manually strangled.

And Sue was hit so hard with the butt of a Daisy 880 BB gun that it left an impression above her left ear.

There were no identifiable footprints leading to or from the cabin and none inside. The only fingerprints found belonged to the Sharps and Dana.

A bent steak knife, a bloody butcher knife, the pellet gun and a hammer were left on a small table near the kitchen.

All Sheila Sharp could do now was hope that Tina was alive and well.

That hope was cruelly dashed sometime after 22 April 1984, when a bottle collector stumbled upon part of a human skull and jawbone at Camp Eighteen, near Feather River Canyon in Butte County, California, 100 miles away from Keddie. A blue nylon jacket was found a short distance away, along with a pair of Levi’s (one back pocket missing), a blanket and a surgical tape dispenser.

A man telephoned the Butte County Sheriff’s Office to say that they were the remains of Tina Sharp before ringing off.

And he was proven correct within weeks by forensics.

Baffled, the Plumas County Sheriff’s Office requested permission to put Justin Smartt under hypnosis. His mother agreed. Justin thought he slept through the night, but under hypnosis revealed that after hearing noise in the living room, he got out of bed to investigate and saw two men arguing with Sue Sharp. As Justin stood watching, Johnny and Dana turned up and immediately jumped into the quarrel. The young boy went back to bed, but got out of bed a second time and saw Tina being led through the kitchen by one of the men and out the back door.

While Justin described the men, he failed to identify either as his stepfather, possibly because he could not accept the idea of Martin Smartt participating in a triple homicide and kidnapping.

But his mother Marilyn believes Smartt was one of the killers.

Plumas County Sheriff Doug Thomas contacted the Department of Justice in Sacramento soon after the murders. Special agents Harry Bradley and P. A. Crim of the division’s organised crime unit arrived in Keddie to investigate.

Why would the DOJ send special agents from the organised crime unit to investigate a a triple homicide and kidnapping in the sticks? Why not homicide?

As it so happened, (Severin John) ‘Bo’ Boubede, an ex-convict connected to organised crime in Chicago, lived in one of the Keddie cabins, a house guest of Marilyn and Martin Smartt, Smartt claiming to have invited him to stay after a chance meeting at the Veteran’s Administration.

He said wanted to give Boubede a chance to get back on his feet.

Why would anyone invite a complete stranger to live with him and his wife? And Smartt was no angel, an abusive and unfaithful husband said to deal in drugs on the side. They met a few weeks before the murders, around the time Smartt lost his job as a cook at Keddie Resort. Smartt and his wife were a low-income couple, receiving taxpayer-funded benefits. There was Justin to support and the fact that Smartt had recently lost his job prompts this question: How could they support Boubede for any length of time, much less weeks?

Perhaps the part-time drug dealing was really rather profitable.

As for the agents sent to Keddie by the DOJ, they gave up after a fortnight – a 12-year-old girl was missing – and handed the case right back to the Plumas County Sheriff’s Office. Oddly, they had used a volunteer sketch artist who occasionally helped out at the Reno Police Department to provide sketches of the suspects described by Justin Smartt under hypnosis. But this man not only lacked forensic training, he lacked artistic talent.

Why was a properly trained (and experienced) FBI sketch artist not brought in?

One would be forgiven for wondering if the agents knew Bo Boubede lived in one of the Keddie Resort cabins with the Smartts. After he and Martin Smartt were questioned, neither was ever troubled again.

All we have is Marilyn Smartt’s version of events.

On the night of 11 April 1984, the Smartts and Bo Boubede, headed for a bar, dropped in on Sue Sharp to ask her to join them. She declined. The Smartts should have expected as much, having met her at community college (all were enrolled in the same business course as she), widely known there for discouraging friendly overtures.

The Smartts and Bo went to the bar. Smartt complained about the music being played, so they left and went home. It was about 11:00 p.m. Marilyn decided to call it a night; the men returned to the bar.

She woke up at 2:00 a.m. and saw her husband and Boubede burning something in the wood-burning stove.

After the murders, Smartt loudly complained that his claw hammer was missing.

The Smartts soon separated, Martin Smartt moving to the town of Paradise in Butte County, California. He was living there in 1984, when a man rang the Butte County Sheriff’s Office anonymously in 1984 to identify pieces of bone found that April as the remains of Tina Sharp.

Troubled by the idea of a looming divorce, Smartt sent his wife a letter containing what appears to be a confession:

“I’ve paid the price for your love, and now I’ve bought it with four lives and you tell me we’re through. Great!”

His therapist – Smartt suffered from PTSD – would reveal he confessed to murdering Sue and Tina, ‘but had nothing to do with the boys,’ adding: ‘Tina had to be killed because she had seen everything.’

Speaking of the boys, Boubede loathed Johnny, calling him a ‘punk’. Why Boubede should have known him well enough to dislike him so is not clear. However, someone provided a possible clue after the murders, claiming that Dana had recently stolen a large quantity of LSD. This is particularly interesting given that Martin Smartt reputedly dealt in drugs. Was there a connection? And if Dana had indeed made off with a significant quantity of drugs, was his friend Johnny involved?

It is worth mentioning that Dana suffered more than Johnny and was manually strangled. By Boubede, perhaps?

Incidentally, a claw hammer was recovered from a local pond (found with the aid of a metal detector) in 2016, matching the description of the hammer Smartt reported as missing in 1981. Plumas County Special Investigator Mike Gamberg took it into evidence; Plumas County Sheriff Greg Hagwood commented given that it was found in a pond, the hammer was ‘intentionally put there. It would not have been accidentally misplaced.’

If Martin Smartt threw the hammer in the pond, it was because he believed it could incriminate him. Mentioning it as missing wasn’t clever; drawing attention to oneself after a triple homicide committed just meters away wasn’t clever. Not that it mattered anymore as far as Smartt was concerned: he had died in Portland, Oregon in 2000; Boubede, his probable partner in crime, died in Chicago in 1988.

Smartt passed a polygraph test in 1981. But polygraph tests are not foolproof; at the time of writing, polygraphs are admissible in court in just 18 (out of 50) states.

I happen to believe Smartt and Boubede were guilty. Smartt’s counsellor said she reported his confession to the Plumas County Sheriff’s Office, but there is no evidence that a statement was ever taken.

In 2020, it was revealed that DNA was extracted from evidence gathered from the crime scene and there may have been as many as 6 people involved in the murders, including those who were accessories after the fact. Speaking of the crime scene, cabin 28 was demolished in 2004, having attracted not only the curious, but squatters.

Sheila Sharp has resisted hypnosis all these years. Now a 55-year-old grandmother, she told People magazine in 2016 that she likes to remember the ‘happy times’ with a loving mother who brought up her children to care about others. Even so, she continues to cooperate with the police, hoping that the mystery will be solved.




The Florida Youth Minister and Mental Health Counselor Turned Killer

Former youth pastor Ronnie Leon Hyde was convicted in a Florida courtoom of murder on Friday of the murder of a Florida teenager in 1994.

Ronnie Leon Hyde, convicted of first-degree murder and abuse of a corpse. He remains to be tried on multiple counts of possession of child pornography.

Daisy Williams always wondered what happened to her twin brother Freddy, who disappeared in 1994. Then 16, he was known to leave home for extended periods of time. But one day he left and never came back. No one she knew had ever heard from him. As unpalatable as the idea was, Daisy wondered if he was murdered all those years ago. Searching the Internet in 2014, she saw a highlighted case on the National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children website, ‘Lake City John Doe’.

A woman walking her dog made the gruesome discovery of a torso of a white male, later believed to be under 25, behind a Dumpster at a BP petrol station on 5 June 1994. The head, hands and legs had been removed (and have never been found).

Daisy last saw her twin in June 1994. On a hunch, she contacted the Centre.

DNA samples collected from family members proved her absolutely correct: the torso was indeed that of Fred Paul Laster, identified in 2016.

Freddy Laster (1978 – 1994).

And while his murderer is believed to have washed and drained the torso, they left behind a great deal of evidence, all of it bagged and stored by forensics.

Daisy disclosed the name of the man Freddy was last seen with: Ronnie Leon Hyde, a licenced mental health counselor and youth pastor.

Another witness reported seeing a sports car similar to the one Hyde drove at the time near the petrol station.

Hyde knew their grandmother through church. A predator, he used six motherless, vulnerable children to forge close relationships with Freddy and his older brother Travis, going so far as to act as foster father to Freddy, later claiming that he’d declared the boy on his taxes.

The Laster children were poorly supervised, the household so disorganised that no one reported Freddy missing until February 1995. Deeply unhappy, he’d left home before. According to one report, the rest of the family assumed he was with Hyde. Oddly, Hyde would bring the subject up, telling Travis that Freddy jumped out of his car and he never saw him again.

But Hyde said nothing for a decade after the event.

Twenty-two years later, his DNA was found on Freddy’s bloodstained long-sleeved red flannel shirt, left behind with his remains.

Hyde’s house in Jacksonville has been demolished.

A search warrant was issued. On 7 March 2017, there was a multi-agency raid on Hyde’s home in Jacksonville. As it turned out, Hyde is a hoarder, possibly a hoarder who keeps grisly souvenirs, common with killers. But never throwing anything away allowed police to find knives and an ‘egg crate-style mattress topper’ similar to those left with Freddy’s remains.

Non-slip bathtub stickers were left behind the Dumpster as well. Hyde’s home was so filthy that he had not scrubbed the bathtub for 23 years: the outlines of the stickers were clearly visible in 2017.

Hyde was arrested that day.

While ruled inadmissable, what was said in court (prompting a sidebar) strongly suggests that the accused molested Travis Laster; what would have stopped him from doing the same to the emotionally fragile Freddy (excerpts from his journal were read aloud in court) then murdering him for reasons best known to himself?

Hyde denies culpability. When asked point blank by his attorney, his coached response was: ‘Oh no. I never hurt that kid.’

For the record, Hyde has never confessed. When investigators stressed that all evidence in the case pointed to him, Hyde responded with: ‘There’s evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald killed President Kennedy, but that don’t [sic] make it true.’

He appears to have believed that he could not be convicted provided he made no admission of guilt. Seemingly without a conscience, Hyde is likely to believe that he is more intelligent than most, capable of fooling everyone around him. If so, he was dead wrong. Far from taking stock in his protestations of innocence, the jury simply did not believe him. And this was after his attorney succeeded in separating this trial from his upcoming trial for possession of child pornography; that precaution ultimately did her client no good at all.

Hyde was 38 when he murdered Freddy. He is now 65 and will never leave prison alive: the life sentence imposed is mandatory in the state of Florida.

Prosecutors chose not to seek the death penalty.

Hyde remains to be tried on multiple counts of possession of child pornography, each count punishable by up to five (5) years in prison, five (5) years probation and a $5,000 fine.

The accused is facing no less than 25 counts.

Man in Texas Stores Son in Freezer for Four Years

Police in New Boston, Texas (about 20 miles from Texarkana) were asked to perform a welfare check on a relative, Jason McMichael. Father David McMichael, 67, answered the door on Tuesday at 5 pm.

The person who made the call had not spoken to either man in a while.

The police officers asked McMichael if they knew why they were there. He said it was because ‘he had a body in the kitchen.’ (Remember, this was a welfare check; imagine how the police officers felt!)

David McMichael, who kept human remains in his freezer for four years.

McMichael said that the remains in the freezer were those of his son Jason, who died in May 2018.

No one apart from David and Jason McMichael was living in the home.

The ‘skeletal’ remains are those of a male.

The cause of death has not yet been determined. The remains were sent to Dallas for a post mortem.

David McMichael was arrested and charged with the abuse of a corpse. Held overnight in Bowie County jail, he has been transferred to Bi-State Detention Facility in Texarkana.

#truecrime #body #texas #mcmichael #davidmcmichael

Beaten with a Baseball Bat and Left to Die in a Garbage Can: a Remarkable Tale of Survival

Teri Jendusa Larsen of Racine, Wisconsin had had enough. Her husband was abusive, had always been abusive and showed no signs of changing. So Teri filed for divorce in November 1999. But Larsen used every means at his disposal to drag out the process until a judge agreed with Teri, that enough was enough.

The divorce was finalised on 31 January 2001. Larsen’s sobs echoed throughout the courtroom, much to the discomfiture of his soon-to-be former wife. Once the decree was read, Larsen leaped to his feet. He walked over to Teri, paused, then snarled: ‘You’re gonna regret this,’ he snarled.

And Teri used to think Larsen was quite a catch.

Teri and First Husband David Larsen at Their 1996 Wedding

A former Marine, Larsen was an air traffic controller who owned his own home, which appealed to Teri. So did his fun-loving personality. They had known one another for a long time. Both wanted children. It was only after they married in 1996 that Teri discovered Larsen was a monster.

He struck her for the first time during their honeymoon in Hawaii. Shocked and deeply upset, Teri demanded an explanation.

‘You do what I say, we are married now,’ he replied. ‘You are bought and paid for.’

Teri dismissed the harrowing encounter as a lover’s quarrel. Daughter Amanda arrived in 1997, followed by Holly in 1999. By this time, Teri wanted a divorce. Larsen was a classic control freak, ordering Teri to leave the bathroonm door open whenever she showered. And woe betide her should she forget to draw the shower curtains. On one particulary memorable occasion, he fished in the kitchen waste bin and found a freezer burned sausage. Teri joked: ‘Why don’t you bring it over here and I’ll cook it up for you?’ Larsen responded with a lengthy lecture about her wasting his money.

But it was a row over dry spaghetti that prompted Teri to leave with Amanda and Holly in tow.

Larsen wandered into the kitchen and saw the ingredients for a spaghetti dinner on the counter, including dry spaghetti. He ordered Teri to put the pasta away immediately before it went off. Teri explained that dry pasta would not spoil, but to no avail. Larsen wanted complete obedience from her. A frightened Teri ran to the basement and hid.

Larsen frightened Teri so badly on this occasion that she hid in the basement. She recalls thinking: ‘I’m 30 years old, sitting on a box in my basement, hiding from my husband. What the hell am I doing?’

Another row upset toddler Amanda so much that she hid under a table, covered her ears and said ‘shut up’ as if reciting a mantra. This was too much. Teri literally ran for her life with the children, seeking temporary refuge at a domestic violence shelter.

The divorce was one matter, custody of the little girls another. Teri wanted full custody. Larsen demanded joint custody and got it, thanks to a sympathetic judge. Teri was appalled.

‘He’s violent towards me’, she protested. ‘Why should he be alone with our kids?’

Joint custody made her life absolutely miserable. Larsen hurled verbal abuse at Teri all too often, even physically assaulting her. Teri rang the police twice, then got a restraining order. She refused to pick up/drop off the children anywhere other than a public place. And she always took a friend or relative with her.

Larsen kept firearms at home. This contravened the restraining order, but Larsen could have cared less. Teri knew he had guns in his house, but the police could not search the house without a warrant.

Over time, Teri, despite the restraining order and the guns, relaxed. It was not always possible to have a friend or relative accompany her. She found it inconvenient to exchange the children at McDonald’s. Or a hardware store. So she began turning up the house she once shared with Larsen, but refused to step inside.

Larsen had deteriorated since the divorce. Having a girlfriend did not help him: Amanda and Holly told Teri he was on the verge of becoming a hoarder. Still obsessed with his failed marriage, he showed the children photographs and videos of the wedding as well as Teri’s wedding dress. ‘Mommy doesn’t keep her promises,’ he would sigh.

Teri and Her Daughters at Her Wedding to Nick Nicolai

Meanwhile, Teri had moved on with her life. She married again, choosing ‘a wonderful man’, Nick Nicolai. And she hoped Larsen would get it together, the sooner the better.

Saturdy, 31 January 2004 was the third anniversary of the divorce. Teri had other things on her mind. She and Nick were celebrating the previous evening: Teri was pregnant.

It was morning. Larsen came to the door, telling Teri that Amanda and Holly were playing hide-and-seek and wanted her to find them. Her gut told her not to go inside. But she did not want to disappoint the girls.

Immediately after stepping over the threshold, Teri noticed that Larsen was unusually calm. Then he started dredging up the past.

‘You always said I was abusing you,’ he complained. ‘Now you can see what abuse really is.’

He swung at her head with a baseball bat.

Amanda and Holly were at the back of the house, crying becuase they were hungry, no longer interested in the film they had been watching. But they never saw Larsen strike Teri. The film prevented them from hearing the smack of wood on flesh and bone. Teri believes she was struck at least 10 times, possibly as many as 20 times. Blood filled her ears. Her hair was quickly soaked in blood; as she recalls, it was ‘everywhere’, dripping on to the carpet. She drifted in an out of consciousness.

Then she saw the kill kit.

Larsen had a roll of duct tape, rags and an empty Rubbermaid garbage can at the ready. Wasting no time, he removed most of her clothing before binding her wrists and ankles. He taped her mouth shut. Then he tried to dump her battered body into the garbage can head first.

Teri struggled. Afraid that her weight on her neck and head would kill her, she resisted as much as she could. Larsen, in a hurry, gave up and she went into the can feet first. Teri is 5’8″; it was a tight squeeze. Her legs were bent at the knee.

Larsen put the lid on and rolled the garbage can out the front door and on the front lawn to scoop up snow, packing it around Teri before replacing the lid and sealing it with duct tape. He rolled the can to his green Dodge 4 x 4 pickup truck and dropped it into a freezing cold cargo box in the back, covering the box with a tarp.

Then he occupied himself with hooking her car to the truck. Teri was conscious. Larsen had stepped away. So she rang 911.

Larsen had not noticed the she still had her cell phone. Almost as miraculously, the duct tape on her mouth had loosened so she could speak.

The first time she rang 911, all Teri could do was say that she couldn’t breathe – and repeat the address, over and over.

Then she rang her husband. He listened in horror (and would ring 911). Teri then rang 911 again. The dispatcher recognised the address from the previous call. The caller was clearly having difficulty breathing. Even so, she disclosed critical information apart from the address: her location, the make of the vehicle, Larsen’s name and her own.

Meanwhile, Larsen loaded the children into the truck and drove off. Only then did Teri hear police sirens.

The police were too late. No one was at home. They saw evidence of a fierce struggle, with broken glass everywhere. They began knocking on doors and were told that Larsen had towed his ex-wife’s car away. And that there were two small children involved. An Amber Alert was issued and police detectives went to the house. Nicolai said his wife was wearing black sweatpants. They found them on the living room floor, covered in blood. And there was blood on the carpet. They soon found a gun case; it was empty. Larsen was armed and his children and badly injured ex-wife were missing.

Close to 100 law enforcement officers were immediately assigned to the case. Larsen was now wanted for false imprisonment and kidnapping. With amazing speed, volunteers, seemingly out of nowhere, organised themselves into search parties. There were a number of houses under construction in the vicinity; Teri might be held prisoner in a basement.

Time was of the essence. Not only was Teri seriously hurt, it was extremely cold. Below 5 degrees Fahrenheit that morning, the temperature would rise to a high of 16 degrees overnight.

Larsen dropped Amanda and Holly off with his girlfriend and continued to drive. Determined to make Teri disappear, he believed he would get away with it.

He worked as an air traffic controller over the state line, in Wheeling, Ilinois. Police detectives were waiting for him to turn up for work.

It occured to the detectives that Larsen might have killed Teri and the little girls when he arrived alone at the airport. Even so, they calmly informed him that his ex-wife was missing. Could he come down to the station? Perhaps he could help. Larsen agreed.

He said that Teri had never turned up that morning, so he left Amanda and Holly with his girlfriend on his way to work.

The little girls were safe and sound, but the detectives were troubled that they had not seen Teri that morning.

Larsen stuck to his version of events until a police detective brought up the bloody sweatpants. Larsen blanched. He hastily changed his story, admitting that Teri had turned up – and attacked him in the living room, forcing him to defend himself.

Meanwhile, Teri was slowly freezing to death.

Larsen was lying and the detectives knew it. They had been questioning him for 6 1/2 hours. Neither law enforcement nor the kind-hearted volunteers had found Teri. Time was running out. But now they had reason to detain Larsen: he admitted to an altercation with his missing ex-wife. They went through his wallet, looking for clues and found the business card of a storage facility close to where Larsen owned property. The detectives knew he was a property owner, thanks to being thorough and going through the divorce papers they found in his house: one listed the properties Larsen owned.

The storage facility was a short distance from one property. A phone call revealed that Larsen was there earlier.

Teri was found in the far corner of the unit. She was so badly injured that law enforcement decided to let emergency services remove her from the garbage can.

One detective would recall that her feet were so badly frostbitten that it looked like she was wearing black socks. A doctor who treated her at the emergency room was shocked by her injuries: a crushed skull along with severe frostbite, her head grotesquely swollen. She could not open her eyes. Her core body temperature was a life-threatening 89 degrees; one more hour in the storage unit and she would have died. The doctor was astonished to see that she ‘was black and blue all over…she just wasn’t recognisable as a human being.’

But Teri was thinking about Amanda and Holly. Where were they? Were they all right?

All was not well, though: Teri would spend nearly seven weeks in hospital, operated on 10 times. She lost her the baby she was carrying. And she lost her toes to frostbite: surgery was required to remove them all, upsetting her father very much. ‘Do you have to take her toes?’ he asked the surgeon, knowing what the answer was. Unable to walk after losing her toes, Teri was wheelchair bound at home for a while, ‘pissed’ that she could neither jog nor tuck her children in bed.

Teri Jendusa-Nicolai

On 16 August 2005, David Larsen was sentenced to 37 years in state prison for attempted first-degree intentional homicide. He was sentenced the following year in federal court to life for kidnapping and interstate domestic abuse, having beaten Teri than transported her from Wisconsin to Illinois. His 2010 appeal failed and appears to have planned to escape from prison. Teri for one was not at all surprised.

David Larsen During His Unsuccessful Appeal, 2010

Today, Larsen is online, complaining. He says he was barred from paying for a lawyer of his choice, denied a trial, is ‘falsely’ imprisoned and was once ‘a highly successful businessman and entrepreneur’ whose assets were illegally seized and so on. (Hard to believe anyone can be so delusional and not confined to a mental hospital.) Describing himself as a Christian man, he wants to hear from a like-minded woman. Predictably for a sociopath or psychopath (I have no doubt that he is one or the other), Larsen compliments himself to the skies towards the end, he is: ‘very straight-forward [sic], hard-working, honest, loving, loyal, kind, intelligent’ and so forth. (No, I am not making this up!)

Teri, on the other hand, is an advocate for victims of domestic abuse. Happily, she and her second husband Nick are the parents of a young son.

Solving a Cold Case: The Racially Motivated Murder of Timothy Coggins

Sheriff’s deputies were knocking on doors in Griffin on Sunday, 9 October 1983, searching for someone who could identify a body. A young Black man was dead, found in nearby Sunny Side on a power line behind a pile of wood, underneath an enormous oak called ‘the Hanging Tree’.

It was a clear cut case of murder, and a racially motivated one at that, the victim stabbed 7 times in the abdomen, an ‘X’ cut into his chest and back, seemingly representing the crossed bars of the Confederate flag. Partially stripped, he was dragged behind a vehicle, most likely a truck. As the post-mortem would reveal, the man was alive at the time and alive when dumped like so much rubbish, left to bleed out, the body to be discovered by passerby .

The Hanging Tree was where drug deals were made in this poor white neighbourhood. Now it would be associated with a racially motivated murder. Coggins was murdered not only because he was African-American, but because he was dating a white woman. As it so happened, he mentioned this to a friend just hours before died.

Spalding County sheriff’s deputy Jesse Gates, one of very few Black local law enforcement officers at the time, gave him a ride to the People’s Choice nightclub the evening of Friday, 7 October. Coggins was walking, but hailed Gates down for a lift, his destination beyond the edge of town.

On the way there, Coggins happened to mention that he was seeing a white woman. Gates was not pleased; Griffin was not Atlanta, 40 miles away. Griffin was a small town with a small town mentality, as Gates pointed out to his friend. There was a local chapter of the Ku Klux Klan that staged rallies and parades.

‘I said, “Man, you need to watch yourself on dating them sisters like that because we live in Griffin, Georgia, and not Atlanta, and some people just don’t accept things like that,”‘ Gates would recall.

Timothy Coggins.

But it was the weekend and Coggins paid little if any attention. He dated white women and had white friends in town. Keeping his apprehension to himself, Gates took his friend where he wanted to go, the People’s Choice nightclub.

The People’s Choice drew African-American patrons. A place to eat, drink and socialise, there was a fully stocked bar, barbequed meat and music; patrons danced to Aretha Franklin, Marvin Gaye and Michael Jackson. And Timothy Coggins loved to dance. Since the patrons were Black, though, the young white woman he took to the dance floor stood out like a proverbial sore thumb.

Gates drove up to the nightclub and his law enforcement instincts immediately kicked in: there were three white men he did not recognise hovering by the door. White people did not go to People’s Choice; so what were they doing there?

Coggins, looking forward to an evening of fun, thanked his friend and got out of the car.

Gates would never see him again. The news shattered him. ‘I was heartbroken,’ he recalled. Gates felt tremendously guilty: ‘I had no way of knowing that I dropped that boy off to his death.’

Timothy’s younger sister Telisa, 21, was there that evening. She noticed a white man looking for her brother and saw them leave the nightclub together, never imagining that would be the last time she would see him. Telisa was not alarmed when he went missing the following day: Timothy, popular around town, was known to serially couch surf from time to time.

Sheriff’s deputies knocked on her door two days later, on Sunday, 9 October. They had the exceptionally unpleasant duty of showing horrifying photographs of the body found to anyone who opened the door in the hopes of identifying the deceased. Talisa told the police she had no idea who was in the photographs, but that wasn’t true; she knew Timothy had a tattoo on one of his hands and was missing two of his bottom teeth. Later, she admitted she knew exactly who was in the photographs, but could not accept that Timothy was dead – and had clearly died a terrible death.

His injuries were so extensive that there was a closed casket at the funeral.

Their brother Tyrone was deeply affected by the tragedy, mystified as to who would hate his charming, kind-hearted brother enough to torture and murder him. He remembers a young man who was well-liked, who was happy to help anyone who needed his help. Telisa agrees, remembering her brother’s sweet nature; Timothy ‘could get along with anybody.’. Who would want to hurt him?

The only logical explanation was that he was the victim of a hate crime.

Telisa thought of the white woman at People’s Choice; she thought her brother was teaching her to dance. It occurred to her that the woman might be connected to what happened to Timothy.

She says that the family knew it was a hate crime even before the coroner’s report was released. A bloody shirt was left for her stepfather, up early to drive a school bus, to find. Then someone threw a brick at the house through a window, shattering the glass. It was wrapped in a piece of paper with a message written on it: ‘You’re next.’ Then there was a threatening phone call. The family wondered if the Klan was behind the murder. All they knew for certain was that the investigation faded away after a fortnight. And they thought they knew why: Timothy was a Black man, his murderer was white.

As it so happened, they were right, but that would not be proven for over 30 years.

It did not help that witnesses told different versions of events; did Coggins leave the nightclub with a white man looking for him or the white woman he was dancing with? Did he get into a car with three white men or not? And so on. And it did not help that there was virtually no physical evidence apart from tyre tracks left at the scene of the crime, no knife, nor the chain used to drag Coggins behind a truck.

His family had no choice but to live with no hope of the murderer ever being brought to justice. His niece Heather Coggins is the family spokesperson; she would comment on her family’s thoughts at the time:

‘We kind of felt that the case didn’t really matter—not forgotten, just unimportant,” she said. ‘That he was just another black man from a poor part of town, who was murdered and nobody really cared.’

The indifference of local law enforcement and the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) brings her to tears to this day. The Coggins family despaired whenever they thought about how no one had ever been arrested for Timothy’s murder. No person or persons of interest, certainly no suspect. Nothing. ‘We learned to deal with it,’ Heather says. All the family heard were crickets until 26 July 2016, a date Heather Coggins will never forget; Sheriff Darrell Dix rang and said ‘Hey, I think we’re going to reopen Tim’s case.’

Sheriff Dix was the newly-elected sheriff of Spalding County. A modest man, he summed up his reason for reopening the case in six words: ‘It’s the right thing to do.’

Sheriff Darrell Dix.

Truer words were never spoken.

Murderers often brag about their horrific crimes to others. But Frankie Gebhardt could not stop boasting, telling others what he did no sooner than Coggins’s body was found, telling Willard Sanders just hours after Sanders and others discovered the body. Sanders had known Gebhardt since 1964, when both were just 6 years old. Gebhardt told him that he and his brother-in-law William Moore tortured and killed Timothy Coggins.

Did Sanders go to the police? No. From a moral standpoint, he should have, despite knowing Gebhardt for years: this was murder. And he would have spared the Coggins family decades of suffering. However, everyone was terrified of Gebhardt and his partner in crime William Moore, afraid for their families as well as themselves.

Since Coggins was found at the roots of the Hanging Tree, notorious for drug deals, the police assumed drugs played a role in his death; he was known to sell marijuana and was reputedly badly in need of money. But no money was found, a clue that his death wasn’t related to drugs. But there the investigation, such as it was, ended. The case lay dormant for 33 years, until a witness came forward and the case was revived.

Over 60 witnesses were interviewed; as it turned out, Gebhardt and Moore were suspected by the police in 1983. Gebhardt was interviewed by the police, but nothing more.

The case was not re-examined until 2016, when Jared Coleman, the GBI special agent assigned to it took the first step by having good look at the file. There was a diary kept by a former sheriff’s deputy in the 1980s who had taken on a risky assignment, infiltrating the local Ku Klux Klan. While it was written in 1982, the diary spoke volumes to race relations in Spalding County at the time, with members of local law enforcement secretly joining the Klan.

Both Sheriff Dix and special agent Coleman felt encouraged. Coleman soon discovered that a witness had named Gebhardt and Moore as the killers. Christopher Vaughn was interviewed several times by law enforcement, but no further action was taken, partly because Vaughn was not a desirable witness: he is a convicted child molester. Even so, agent Coleman interviewed Vaughn on 26 April 2017 and discovered that Gebhardt explicitly told him he murdered Coggins. The reason? Coggins was sleeping with Gebhardt’s girlfriend Ruth Elizabeth Guy, known as Mickey. He must have told Mickey what he did, because she left Georgia a week or two after the murder, never to return. (Mickey Guy died in 2010.)

There was another reason law enforcement ignored Christopher Vaughn apart from the horrendous nature of his crimes: racism. Any member of law enforcement who belonged to the Klan (or was in sympathy with it) in 1983 was hardly likely to pursue a case of white-on-black crime.

Scores of witnesses were interviewed and in October 2017, Gebhardt, 59, and Moore, 58, were arrested.

Frankie Gebhardt.
William Moore.

Both were held without bond pending trial.

Three additional arrests were made in connection with the case: Gebhardt’s sister Sandra Bunn, 61, her son Lamar 32, and Gregory Huffman, 47, all charged with obstruction of justice. Bunn and Huffman both faced an additional charge of violating one’s oath as a detention officer; Lamar Bunn was a police officer in Milner, approximately 10 miles from Griffin. Huffman faced one additional charge, violating his oath as a detention officer.

Boasts about the murder would haunt the perpetrators, with Gebhardt in particular known to bring it up when he drank, recounting how he dragged Coggins from his pickup truck on a chain down Minter Road, threatening to drag anyone who talked down the very same road, terrifying would-be witnesses into silence. But as Gebhardt and Moore aged and became increasingly ‘frail’ – one of the men is confined to a wheelchair – at least one acquaintance came forward. Prior to that, those Gebhardt and Moore confessed to (and their families) had a very real fear of retribution, as Sheriff Dix readily acknowledged.

And Gebhardt and Moore, who managed to land in the same penitentiary at the same time (Gebhardt for aggravated assault), made matters worse comes home by posing as a pair of tough guys and telling fellow prisoners about the murder, presumably to prevent themselves from being attacked behind bars. Neither of them believed a fellow prisoner would contact the authorities.

They were wrong.

The defendants were to be tried together, but defence lawyers succeeded in severing the trials. Neither trial would be a walk in the park for the prosecution: there was almost no physical evidence, witnesses contradicted one another and other witnesses were convicted felons, not surprising given that both Gebhart and Moore had extensive criminal histories. But justice prevailed: Frankie Gebhardt was found guilty of first-degree murder, assault and battery and sentenced to life in prison plus 30 years on 26 June 2018. Members of the Coggins openly wept in court, having waited for 34 years for justice for Timothy.

He is currently incarcerated at the Georgia State Prison in Reidsville; there is no possibility of parole.

Wheelchair-bound William Moore was charged with murder. He made a deal, pleading guilty to voluntary manslaughter and sentenced to 20 years plus 10 years probation, banned from Spalding County upon release as well as adjoining stretches of Fayette, Pike and Upson Counties. He is currently incarcerated at Johnson State Prison in Wrightsville, eligible for release on 12 October 2037; I predict he will use his poor health in an attempt at early release.

Violet Coggins-Dorsey did not live to see the day, but shortly before her death from kidney failure associated with diabetes in 2016, she turned to Telisa and said: ‘They found who killed Tim.’

Startled, Telisa asked her mother what she just said.

‘They found out who killed Tim,’ she said. ‘I ain’t gonna be here for it, but they’re gonna get who killed Tim.’

Gebhardt and Moore would continue to walk free for the better part of two years. How could she have known?





Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started